PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTCR vs. TRFK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DTCR vs. TRFK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTCR achieves a 32.24% return, which is significantly lower than TRFK's 42.16% return.


DTCR

1D
1.31%
1M
-2.32%
6M
13.84%
YTD
32.24%
1Y
49.85%
3Y*
29.05%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.44%

TRFK

1D
2.15%
1M
-5.74%
6M
39.68%
YTD
42.16%
1Y
50.62%
3Y*
42.90%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
37.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$22.30M$27.23M$44.18M
$17.22M$18.25M$19.56M

DTCR vs. TRFK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
32.24%28.99%14.92%18.93%-18.45%
TRFK
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF
42.16%26.81%38.30%66.63%-10.61%

Correlation

The correlation between DTCR and TRFK is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2022

0.67

The correlation between DTCR and TRFK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTCR vs. TRFK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DTCR
DTCR Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DTCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTCR Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DTCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTCR Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

TRFK
TRFK Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
TRFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRFK Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TRFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRFK Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DTCR vs. TRFK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DTCRTRFKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.24

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

1.94

+0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.79

5.23

+3.56

DTCR vs. TRFK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTCR Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the TRFK Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTCR and TRFK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DTCR vs. TRFK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTCR drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, which is greater than TRFK's maximum drawdown of -29.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTCR and TRFK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTCRTRFKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.98%

-29.06%

-9.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.88%

-26.17%

+8.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.96%

-29.06%

+4.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.04%

-18.08%

+4.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.26%

-6.25%

-6.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.68%

9.70%

-4.02%

Volatility

DTCR vs. TRFK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) is 8.26%, while Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) has a volatility of 16.62%. This indicates that DTCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRFK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTCRTRFKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.26%

16.62%

-8.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.62%

32.05%

-12.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.76%

36.82%

-12.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.51%

30.90%

-8.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.25%

30.90%

-8.65%

DTCR vs. TRFK - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTCR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TRFK's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

DTCR vs. TRFK - Dividend Comparison

DTCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than TRFK's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
0.89%1.10%1.72%1.18%2.57%1.27%0.30%
TRFK
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF
0.01%0.01%0.40%0.20%0.56%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DTCR and TRFK have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRFK has higher volatility (16.62%) compared to DTCR (8.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTCR dropped -38.98% vs TRFK's -29.06%.

On 3-year performance, TRFK leads with 42.90% vs 29.05% for DTCR. On fees, DTCR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DTCR has been the lower-risk option at 8.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TRFK has performed better with a 42.90% return vs 29.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DTCR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TRFK.

DTCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.01% for TRFK.

DTCR is categorized as REIT, while TRFK is Technology Equities. DTCR tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index, while TRFK tracks Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DTCR and 0.60% for TRFK.

DTCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTCR and TRFK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer