PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTCR vs. FDVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DTCR vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTCR achieves a 47.68% return, which is significantly higher than FDVV's 9.30% return.


DTCR

1D
0.23%
1M
1.80%
YTD
47.68%
6M
48.56%
1Y
76.02%
3Y*
33.82%
5Y*
14.12%
10Y*

FDVV

1D
0.57%
1M
2.54%
YTD
9.30%
6M
9.44%
1Y
23.92%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
13.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTCR vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
47.68%28.99%14.92%18.93%-30.89%20.35%6.60%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
9.30%17.08%21.81%18.00%-4.21%29.24%20.58%

Correlation

The correlation between DTCR and FDVV is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020

0.61

The correlation between DTCR and FDVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTCR vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTCR
DTCR Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DTCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTCR Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DTCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTCR Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

FDVV
FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTCR vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DTCRFDVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.41

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.64

2.44

+3.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.40

10.11

+7.29

DTCR vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTCR Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTCR and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DTCR vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTCR drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, roughly equal to the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTCR and FDVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTCRFDVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.98%

-40.25%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.89%

-9.30%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.96%

-15.90%

-9.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.98%

-20.18%

-18.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.92%

-0.29%

-3.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.32%

-3.80%

-8.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

2.24%

+1.93%

Volatility

DTCR vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) has a higher volatility of 9.32% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 3.16%. This indicates that DTCR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTCRFDVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.32%

3.16%

+6.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.44%

8.16%

+10.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.99%

10.12%

+12.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.04%

14.76%

+7.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.06%

16.98%

+5.08%

DTCR vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTCR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

DTCR vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

DTCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than FDVV's 2.70% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
0.74%1.10%1.72%1.18%2.57%1.27%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
2.70%2.89%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.66%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


DTCR and FDVV have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTCR has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to FDVV (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTCR dropped -38.98% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

On 5-year performance, DTCR leads with 14.12% vs 13.53% for FDVV. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DTCR has performed better with a 14.12% return vs 13.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DTCR.

FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.74% for DTCR.

DTCR is categorized as REIT, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. DTCR tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DTCR and 0.29% for FDVV.

DTCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTCR and FDVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer