DSTL vs. BGIG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DSTL (Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF) and BGIG (Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DSTL returned 13.97% vs 20.42% for BGIG. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DSTL charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BGIG.

Performance

DSTL vs. BGIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSTL achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly lower than BGIG's 10.33% return.

DSTL

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 1.94%
• YTD: 3.62%
• 6M: 4.05%
• 1Y: 13.97%
• 3Y*: 13.65%
• 5Y*: 9.27%
• 10Y*: —

BGIG

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 2.02%
• YTD: 10.33%
• 6M: 10.33%
• 1Y: 20.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSTL vs. BGIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DSTL Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF	3.62%	8.71%	12.78%	8.97%
BGIG Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF	10.33%	12.49%	16.84%	4.55%

Correlation

The correlation between DSTL and BGIG is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023	0.78

The correlation between DSTL and BGIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DSTL vs. BGIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DSTL	BGIG
Technology	26.7%	24.6%
Healthcare	20.3%	14.6%
Industrials	15.9%	10.6%
Consumer Cyclical	11.6%	5.4%
Communication Services	7.6%	-
Financial Services	6.9%	14.8%
Energy	5.6%	11.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.5%	6.9%
Utilities	1.0%	7.9%
Basic Materials	0.7%	0.6%
Real Estate	-	3.5%

Return for Risk

DSTL vs. BGIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSTL

DSTL Risk / Return Rank: 34
DSTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
DSTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
DSTL Omega Ratio Rank: 31
DSTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
DSTL Martin Ratio Rank: 34

BGIG

BGIG Risk / Return Rank: 72
BGIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
BGIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
BGIG Omega Ratio Rank: 70
BGIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
BGIG Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSTL vs. BGIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DSTL	BGIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	2.28	-1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.80	3.27	-1.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.41	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	3.53	-1.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.08	13.58	-8.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DSTL vs. BGIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSTL Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the BGIG Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSTL and BGIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DSTL	BGIG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	2.28	-1.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	1.40	-0.67

Drawdowns

DSTL vs. BGIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSTL drawdown since its inception was -33.09%, which is greater than BGIG's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSTL and BGIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	DSTL	BGIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.09%	-13.24%	-19.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.30%	-5.81%	-2.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.57%	0.00%	-1.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.15%	-1.70%	-2.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	1.51%	+1.24%

Volatility

DSTL vs. BGIG - Volatility Comparison

Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG) at 2.59%. This indicates that DSTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DSTL	BGIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.52%	2.59%	+0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.41%	6.72%	+1.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.85%	8.99%	+2.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.76%	11.94%	+3.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.39%	11.94%	+7.45%

DSTL vs. BGIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSTL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than BGIG's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

DSTL vs. BGIG - Dividend Comparison

DSTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than BGIG's 1.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BGIG Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF	1.74%	1.89%	2.02%	0.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DSTL Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF	1.23%	1.31%	1.34%	1.30%	1.35%	1.01%	0.83%	0.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DSTL and BGIG in my portfolio?

DSTL and BGIG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DSTL or BGIG?

DSTL has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to BGIG (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSTL dropped -33.09% vs BGIG's -13.24%.

Which ETF is better, DSTL or BGIG?

On 1-year performance, BGIG leads with 20.42% vs 13.97% for DSTL. On fees, DSTL is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, BGIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DSTL or BGIG?

Over the 1-year period, BGIG has performed better with a 20.42% return vs 13.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DSTL or BGIG?

DSTL is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for BGIG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DSTL or BGIG?

BGIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 1.23% for DSTL.

What is the main difference between DSTL and BGIG?

They also come from different issuers: Distillate Capital and Bahl & Gaynor. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DSTL and 0.45% for BGIG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BGIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.