DSPY vs. PRVT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DSPY (Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy) and PRVT (Tema Listed Private Managers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DSPY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Tema, while PRVT is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Tema. Both are actively managed. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DSPY charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PRVT.

Performance

DSPY vs. PRVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY) and Tema Listed Private Managers ETF (PRVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DSPY

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: -0.38%
• 6M: 9.96%
• YTD: 12.27%
• 1Y: 22.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 24.28%

PRVT

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DSPY Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy	$273.16K	$369.65K	$2.14M
PRVT Tema Listed Private Managers ETF	$7.78K	$6.90K	$6.90K

DSPY vs. PRVT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DSPY Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy	-0.38%
PRVT Tema Listed Private Managers ETF	7.22%

Correlation

The correlation between DSPY and PRVT is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2026	0.31

DSPY vs. PRVT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DSPY	PRVT
Technology	30.1%	-
Financial Services	14.9%	98.6%
Healthcare	11.1%	-
Industrials	10.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	-
Communication Services	6.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.9%	-
Energy	4.4%	-
Utilities	3.5%	1.1%
Real Estate	2.6%	100.0%
Basic Materials	2.4%	2.1%

Return for Risk

DSPY vs. PRVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DSPY

DSPY Risk / Return Rank: 79
DSPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
DSPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
DSPY Omega Ratio Rank: 75
DSPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
DSPY Martin Ratio Rank: 86

PRVT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DSPY vs. PRVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY) and Tema Listed Private Managers ETF (PRVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DSPY	PRVT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.58	—	—

Drawdowns

DSPY vs. PRVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSPY drawdown since its inception was -12.15%, which is greater than PRVT's maximum drawdown of -4.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSPY and PRVT.

Drawdown Indicators

	DSPY	PRVT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.15%	-4.07%	-8.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	-0.28%	-0.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.23%	-1.03%	-0.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DSPY	PRVT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.99%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.38%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.96%	24.98%	-13.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.16%	24.98%	-8.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.16%	24.98%	-8.82%

DSPY vs. PRVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSPY has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than PRVT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

DSPY vs. PRVT - Dividend Comparison

DSPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, while PRVT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
DSPY Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy	0.75%	0.72%
PRVT Tema Listed Private Managers ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DSPY and PRVT in my portfolio?

DSPY and PRVT have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DSPY or PRVT?

On fees, DSPY is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DSPY or PRVT?

DSPY is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PRVT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DSPY or PRVT?

DSPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.00% for PRVT.

What is the main difference between DSPY and PRVT?

DSPY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PRVT is Financials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DSPY and 0.75% for PRVT.