PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSPY vs. PRVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DSPY vs. PRVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY) and Tema Listed Private Managers ETF (PRVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DSPY

1D
-0.64%
1M
1.17%
6M
10.40%
YTD
12.99%
1Y
22.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PRVT

1D
-0.64%
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSPY vs. PRVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DSPY and PRVT is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2026

0.14

DSPY vs. PRVT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DSPY
PRVT

Technology

30.2%

-

Financial Services

14.5%

-

Healthcare

11.2%

-

Industrials

10.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%

-

Communication Services

6.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.9%

-

Energy

3.9%

-

Utilities

3.5%

-

Real Estate

2.4%
100.0%

Basic Materials

2.4%

-

Technology

DSPY
30.2%
PRVT

-

Financial Services

DSPY
14.5%
PRVT

-

Healthcare

DSPY
11.2%
PRVT

-

Industrials

DSPY
10.1%
PRVT

-

Consumer Cyclical

DSPY
8.9%
PRVT

-

Communication Services

DSPY
6.7%
PRVT

-

Consumer Defensive

DSPY
5.9%
PRVT

-

Energy

DSPY
3.9%
PRVT

-

Utilities

DSPY
3.5%
PRVT

-

Real Estate

DSPY
2.4%
PRVT
100.0%

Basic Materials

DSPY
2.4%
PRVT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DSPY vs. PRVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSPY
DSPY Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DSPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DSPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSPY Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

PRVT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSPY vs. PRVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY) and Tema Listed Private Managers ETF (PRVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DSPYPRVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.48

DSPY vs. PRVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DSPY vs. PRVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSPY drawdown since its inception was -12.15%, which is greater than PRVT's maximum drawdown of -2.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSPY and PRVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DSPYPRVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.15%

-2.95%

-9.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-0.83%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.22%

-0.82%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

Volatility

DSPY vs. PRVT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DSPYPRVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.78%

31.64%

-19.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.36%

31.64%

-15.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.36%

31.64%

-15.28%

DSPY vs. PRVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSPY has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than PRVT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

DSPY vs. PRVT - Dividend Comparison

DSPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, while PRVT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


DSPY and PRVT have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DSPY is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DSPY is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PRVT.

DSPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.00% for PRVT.

DSPY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PRVT is Financials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DSPY and 0.75% for PRVT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DSPY and PRVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer