PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSPY vs. DBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DSPY vs. DBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSPY achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 35.47% return.


DSPY

1D
-0.36%
1M
5.59%
YTD
12.26%
6M
12.63%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DBC

1D
0.56%
1M
-3.32%
YTD
35.47%
6M
35.36%
1Y
45.90%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*
9.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSPY vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DSPY and DBC is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025

-0.06

DSPY vs. DBC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DSPY
DBC

Technology

28.8%

-

Financial Services

14.2%
91.5%

Industrials

10.8%

-

Healthcare

10.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%

-

Communication Services

7.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.4%

-

Energy

4.4%

-

Utilities

3.0%

-

Real Estate

2.5%

-

Basic Materials

2.3%

-

Technology

DSPY
28.8%
DBC

-

Financial Services

DSPY
14.2%
DBC
91.5%

Industrials

DSPY
10.8%
DBC

-

Healthcare

DSPY
10.6%
DBC

-

Consumer Cyclical

DSPY
9.3%
DBC

-

Communication Services

DSPY
7.7%
DBC

-

Consumer Defensive

DSPY
6.4%
DBC

-

Energy

DSPY
4.4%
DBC

-

Utilities

DSPY
3.0%
DBC

-

Real Estate

DSPY
2.5%
DBC

-

Basic Materials

DSPY
2.3%
DBC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DSPY vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSPY
DSPY Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DSPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DSPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSPY Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

DBC
DBC Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBC Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSPY vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DSPYDBCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.43

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

6.54

-2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.34

13.91

+2.43

DSPY vs. DBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSPY Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the DBC Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSPY and DBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DSPYDBCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.47

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.68

0.12

+1.56

Drawdowns

DSPY vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSPY drawdown since its inception was -12.15%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSPY and DBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DSPYDBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.15%

-76.36%

+64.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.55%

-7.05%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-21.64%

+21.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.25%

-46.22%

+44.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

3.31%

-1.67%

Volatility

DSPY vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY) is 2.82%, while Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that DSPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DSPYDBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

6.45%

-3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.52%

15.75%

-7.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.21%

18.68%

-7.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.53%

19.18%

-2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.53%

17.81%

-1.28%

DSPY vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSPY has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than DBC's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

DSPY vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison

DSPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than DBC's 2.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBC
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund
2.46%3.33%5.22%4.94%0.59%0.00%0.00%1.59%1.30%
DSPY
Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy
0.74%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DSPY and DBC have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBC has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to DSPY (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSPY dropped -12.15% vs DBC's -76.36%.

On 1-year performance, DBC leads with 45.90% vs 26.81% for DSPY. On fees, DSPY is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, DSPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DBC has performed better with a 45.90% return vs 26.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DSPY is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.

DBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 0.74% for DSPY.

DSPY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Tema and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DSPY and 0.85% for DBC.

DBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DSPY and DBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer