DSPY vs. DBC

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

DSPY (Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy) and DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DSPY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Tema, while DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. DSPY is actively managed, while DBC is passively managed. Over the past year, DSPY returned 22.60% vs 31.86% for DBC. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. DSPY charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBC.

Performance

DSPY vs. DBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSPY achieves a 12.78% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 27.28% return.

DSPY

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.22%
• 6M: 10.38%
• YTD: 12.78%
• 1Y: 22.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBC

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: 2.01%
• 6M: 22.67%
• YTD: 27.28%
• 1Y: 31.86%
• 3Y*: 11.51%
• 5Y*: 11.45%
• 10Y*: 8.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSPY vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DSPY Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy	12.78%	18.94%
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund	27.28%	2.72%

Correlation

The correlation between DSPY and DBC is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

DSPY vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSPY

DSPY Risk / Return Rank: 76
DSPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
DSPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
DSPY Omega Ratio Rank: 72
DSPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
DSPY Martin Ratio Rank: 84

DBC

DBC Risk / Return Rank: 56
DBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
DBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
DBC Omega Ratio Rank: 59
DBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
DBC Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSPY vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DSPY	DBC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	1.70	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	2.31	+0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.29	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.01	1.94	+1.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.42	6.62	+6.80

DSPY vs. DBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSPY Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the DBC Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSPY and DBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DSPY vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSPY drawdown since its inception was -12.15%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSPY and DBC.

Drawdown Indicators

	DSPY	DBC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.15%	-76.36%	+64.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.55%	-16.54%	+8.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.54%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.34%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.82%	-26.37%	+25.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.22%	-46.12%	+44.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.69%	4.82%	-3.13%

Volatility

DSPY vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY) is 2.93%, while Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that DSPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DSPY	DBC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.93%	6.03%	-3.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.33%	16.71%	-7.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.74%	18.85%	-7.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.28%	19.29%	-3.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.28%	17.80%	-1.52%

DSPY vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSPY has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than DBC's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

DSPY vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison

DSPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than DBC's 2.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund	2.61%	3.33%	5.22%	4.94%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	1.59%	1.30%
DSPY Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy	0.75%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DSPY and DBC in my portfolio?

DSPY and DBC have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DSPY or DBC?

DBC has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to DSPY (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSPY dropped -12.15% vs DBC's -76.36%.

Which ETF is better, DSPY or DBC?

On 1-year performance, DBC leads with 31.86% vs 22.60% for DSPY. On fees, DSPY is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, DSPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DSPY or DBC?

Over the 1-year period, DBC has performed better with a 31.86% return vs 22.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DSPY or DBC?

DSPY is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DSPY or DBC?

DBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.75% for DSPY.

What is the main difference between DSPY and DBC?

DSPY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Tema and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DSPY and 0.85% for DBC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DSPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.