DSMLX vs. SAGWX
DSMLX (Touchstone Large Company Growth Fund) and SAGWX (Touchstone Small Company Fund) are both mutual funds - DSMLX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Touchstone, while SAGWX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Touchstone. Over the past 10 years, DSMLX returned 5.54%/yr vs 12.00%/yr for SAGWX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DSMLX charges 0.72%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for SAGWX.
Performance
DSMLX vs. SAGWX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DSMLX achieves a -62.38% return, which is significantly lower than SAGWX's 7.58% return. Over the past 10 years, DSMLX has underperformed SAGWX with an annualized return of 5.54%, while SAGWX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.00% annualized return.
DSMLX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -62.38%
- 6M
- -62.69%
- 1Y
- -59.15%
- 3Y*
- -13.88%
- 5Y*
- -10.05%
- 10Y*
- 5.54%
SAGWX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- YTD
- 7.58%
- 6M
- 5.87%
- 1Y
- 20.10%
- 3Y*
- 14.84%
- 5Y*
- 6.70%
- 10Y*
- 12.00%
DSMLX vs. SAGWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSMLX Touchstone Large Company Growth Fund | -62.38% | 15.30% | 29.59% | 33.52% | -26.41% | 21.16% | 29.19% | 47.62% | -5.04% | 38.60% |
SAGWX Touchstone Small Company Fund | 7.58% | 9.58% | 13.32% | 15.71% | -14.64% | 22.83% | 17.58% | 29.44% | -8.42% | 17.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between DSMLX and SAGWX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2009 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DSMLX and SAGWX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DSMLX vs. SAGWX — Risk / Return Rank
DSMLX
SAGWX
DSMLX vs. SAGWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Large Company Growth Fund (DSMLX) and Touchstone Small Company Fund (SAGWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DSMLX | SAGWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.57 | 1.24 | -0.67 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | 2.23 | -3.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.91 | 7.42 | -9.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DSMLX vs. SAGWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DSMLX drawdown since its inception was -64.61%, which is greater than SAGWX's maximum drawdown of -51.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSMLX and SAGWX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DSMLX | SAGWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.61% | -51.87% | -12.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.61% | -9.60% | -55.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.61% | -22.69% | -41.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.61% | -37.07% | -27.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.61% | -41.75% | -22.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.61% | -1.04% | -63.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.84% | -8.87% | +0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.11% | 2.88% | +28.23% |
Volatility
DSMLX vs. SAGWX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Touchstone Large Company Growth Fund (DSMLX) is 0.00%, while Touchstone Small Company Fund (SAGWX) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that DSMLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SAGWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DSMLX | SAGWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 3.86% | -3.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 89.41% | 10.66% | +78.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.39% | 15.49% | +46.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.45% | 22.87% | +13.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.12% | 22.65% | +7.47% |
DSMLX vs. SAGWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DSMLX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than SAGWX's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
DSMLX vs. SAGWX - Dividend Comparison
DSMLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.74%, more than SAGWX's 5.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSMLX Touchstone Large Company Growth Fund | 11.74% | 4.42% | 2.77% | 4.18% | 3.43% | 20.86% | 13.17% | 14.28% | 7.73% | 2.90% | 3.70% | 1.68% |
SAGWX Touchstone Small Company Fund | 5.41% | 5.82% | 6.03% | 0.15% | 2.57% | 19.71% | 0.10% | 11.83% | 14.83% | 9.03% | 8.71% | 21.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DSMLX and SAGWX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SAGWX has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to DSMLX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSMLX dropped -64.61% vs SAGWX's -51.87%.
SAGWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DSMLX and SAGWX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer