PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSM vs. PRSVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DSM vs. PRSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Small Cap Equity Fund (DSM) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSM achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than PRSVX's 16.23% return. Over the past 10 years, DSM has underperformed PRSVX with an annualized return of 1.27%, while PRSVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.53% annualized return.


DSM

1D
0.33%
1M
0.75%
YTD
1.26%
6M
4.70%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
7.20%
5Y*
-1.40%
10Y*
1.27%

PRSVX

1D
-0.83%
1M
1.33%
YTD
16.23%
6M
15.04%
1Y
31.99%
3Y*
15.95%
5Y*
6.18%
10Y*
10.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSM vs. PRSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DSM
Dimensional Small Cap Equity Fund
1.26%10.90%5.52%3.18%-27.04%10.89%3.32%20.57%-13.60%12.79%
PRSVX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund
16.23%8.31%10.84%12.34%-18.53%25.47%12.49%25.82%-11.58%12.84%

Correlation

The correlation between DSM and PRSVX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 1990

0.09

The correlation between DSM and PRSVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.27 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DSM vs. PRSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSM
DSM Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
DSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSM Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
DSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSM Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

PRSVX
PRSVX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
PRSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
PRSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSM vs. PRSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Small Cap Equity Fund (DSM) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DSMPRSVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.34

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

3.66

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.71

13.60

-5.90

DSM vs. PRSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the PRSVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSM and PRSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DSMPRSVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

1.96

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

0.32

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

0.50

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.64

-0.32

Drawdowns

DSM vs. PRSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSM drawdown since its inception was -49.15%, smaller than the maximum PRSVX drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSM and PRSVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DSMPRSVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.15%

-55.37%

+6.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.95%

-8.93%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.04%

-24.60%

+7.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.75%

-28.17%

-10.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.75%

-40.97%

+2.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.59%

-0.83%

-10.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-7.49%

-0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

2.37%

-0.32%

Volatility

DSM vs. PRSVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Small Cap Equity Fund (DSM) is 2.79%, while T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that DSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DSMPRSVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

4.52%

-1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.27%

12.27%

-4.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.45%

16.73%

-6.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.45%

19.79%

-7.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.49%

21.03%

-7.54%

DSM vs. PRSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSM has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PRSVX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

DSM vs. PRSVX - Dividend Comparison

DSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, less than PRSVX's 10.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DSM
Dimensional Small Cap Equity Fund
4.71%4.07%3.72%4.27%5.95%4.31%4.57%5.19%6.11%5.82%6.19%6.17%
PRSVX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund
10.18%11.83%9.77%3.27%5.28%6.98%2.03%4.59%9.46%3.79%3.77%22.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


DSM and PRSVX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRSVX has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to DSM (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSM dropped -49.15% vs PRSVX's -55.37%.

PRSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DSM and PRSVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer