DSI vs. VONG
DSI (iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF) and VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - DSI tracks the MSCI KLD 400 Social Index while VONG tracks the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DSI returned 15.48%/yr vs 18.37%/yr for VONG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DSI charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VONG.
Performance
DSI vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DSI achieves a 8.29% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, DSI has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 15.48%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.37% annualized return.
DSI
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- 8.29%
- 6M
- 6.90%
- 1Y
- 23.00%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 15.48%
VONG
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -4.14%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- -0.13%
- 1Y
- 16.17%
- 3Y*
- 21.82%
- 5Y*
- 12.99%
- 10Y*
- 18.37%
DSI vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSI iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF | 8.29% | 18.03% | 22.38% | 28.51% | -21.71% | 31.32% | 20.94% | 31.15% | -3.90% | 20.89% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 1.40% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.53% | 30.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between DSI and VONG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010 | 0.93 |
The correlation between DSI and VONG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
DSI vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DSI
VONG
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Technology
DSI
VONG
Communication Services
DSI
VONG
Financial Services
DSI
VONG
Industrials
DSI
VONG
Consumer Cyclical
DSI
VONG
Healthcare
DSI
VONG
Consumer Defensive
DSI
VONG
Real Estate
DSI
VONG
Basic Materials
DSI
VONG
Energy
DSI
VONG
Utilities
DSI
VONG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DSI vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank
DSI
VONG
DSI vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DSI | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.18 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 1.00 | +1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.57 | 3.25 | +5.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DSI vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DSI drawdown since its inception was -54.23%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSI and VONG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DSI | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.23% | -32.72% | -21.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.05% | -16.23% | +5.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.58% | -23.27% | +2.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.36% | -32.72% | +4.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.10% | -32.72% | -1.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.66% | -6.96% | +3.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.51% | -4.88% | -2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 4.99% | -2.30% |
Volatility
DSI vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) is 5.58%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 6.02%. This indicates that DSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DSI | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.58% | 6.02% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | 12.51% | -1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.76% | 16.14% | -2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 21.45% | -3.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 20.91% | -2.18% |
DSI vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DSI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DSI vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
DSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than VONG's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSI iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF | 0.89% | 0.92% | 1.03% | 1.19% | 1.39% | 0.99% | 1.22% | 1.40% | 1.63% | 1.28% | 1.51% | 1.46% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, DSI and VONG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VONG has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to DSI (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSI dropped -54.23% vs VONG's -32.72%.
On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.37% vs 15.48% for DSI. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, DSI has been the lower-risk option at 5.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.37% return vs 15.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DSI.
DSI has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.47% for VONG.
DSI tracks MSCI KLD 400 Social Index, while VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DSI and 0.06% for VONG.
DSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DSI and VONG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer