PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSI vs. VONG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DSI vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSI achieves a 8.29% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, DSI has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 15.48%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.37% annualized return.


DSI

1D
-0.17%
1M
-1.49%
YTD
8.29%
6M
6.90%
1Y
23.00%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
12.23%
10Y*
15.48%

VONG

1D
-0.15%
1M
-4.14%
YTD
1.40%
6M
-0.13%
1Y
16.17%
3Y*
21.82%
5Y*
12.99%
10Y*
18.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSI vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DSI
iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF
8.29%18.03%22.38%28.51%-21.71%31.32%20.94%31.15%-3.90%20.89%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
1.40%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%30.05%

Correlation

The correlation between DSI and VONG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.93

The correlation between DSI and VONG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

DSI vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DSI
VONG

Technology

43.1%
54.1%

Communication Services

12.8%
12.0%

Financial Services

10.1%
4.8%

Industrials

8.0%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
12.5%

Healthcare

7.0%
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
2.5%

Real Estate

2.6%
0.4%

Basic Materials

2.2%
0.3%

Energy

1.5%
0.4%

Utilities

0.9%
1.0%

Technology

DSI
43.1%
VONG
54.1%

Communication Services

DSI
12.8%
VONG
12.0%

Financial Services

DSI
10.1%
VONG
4.8%

Industrials

DSI
8.0%
VONG
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DSI
8.0%
VONG
12.5%

Healthcare

DSI
7.0%
VONG
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

DSI
4.0%
VONG
2.5%

Real Estate

DSI
2.6%
VONG
0.4%

Basic Materials

DSI
2.2%
VONG
0.3%

Energy

DSI
1.5%
VONG
0.4%

Utilities

DSI
0.9%
VONG
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DSI vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSI
DSI Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSI Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
DSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSI Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSI vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DSIVONGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.18

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

1.00

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.57

3.25

+5.32

DSI vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSI and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DSI vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSI drawdown since its inception was -54.23%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSI and VONG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DSIVONGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.23%

-32.72%

-21.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.05%

-16.23%

+5.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.58%

-23.27%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.36%

-32.72%

+4.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.10%

-32.72%

-1.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.66%

-6.96%

+3.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.51%

-4.88%

-2.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

4.99%

-2.30%

Volatility

DSI vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) is 5.58%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 6.02%. This indicates that DSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DSIVONGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.58%

6.02%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

12.51%

-1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.76%

16.14%

-2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.04%

21.45%

-3.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.73%

20.91%

-2.18%

DSI vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DSI vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

DSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than VONG's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DSI
iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF
0.89%0.92%1.03%1.19%1.39%0.99%1.22%1.40%1.63%1.28%1.51%1.46%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.47%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DSI and VONG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VONG has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to DSI (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSI dropped -54.23% vs VONG's -32.72%.

On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.37% vs 15.48% for DSI. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, DSI has been the lower-risk option at 5.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.37% return vs 15.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DSI.

DSI has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.47% for VONG.

DSI tracks MSCI KLD 400 Social Index, while VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DSI and 0.06% for VONG.

DSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DSI and VONG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer