DSI vs. IVV
DSI (iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DSI is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI KLD 400 Social Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DSI returned 15.48%/yr vs 15.57%/yr for IVV. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DSI charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
DSI vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DSI having a 8.29% return and IVV slightly lower at 8.13%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DSI having a 15.48% annualized return and IVV not far ahead at 15.57%.
DSI
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- 8.29%
- 6M
- 6.90%
- 1Y
- 23.00%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 15.48%
IVV
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- 8.13%
- 6M
- 6.81%
- 1Y
- 22.31%
- 3Y*
- 20.76%
- 5Y*
- 13.03%
- 10Y*
- 15.57%
DSI vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSI iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF | 8.29% | 18.03% | 22.38% | 28.51% | -21.71% | 31.32% | 20.94% | 31.15% | -3.90% | 20.89% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 8.13% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between DSI and IVV is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2006 | 0.93 |
The correlation between DSI and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
DSI vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DSI
IVV
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Technology
DSI
IVV
Communication Services
DSI
IVV
Financial Services
DSI
IVV
Industrials
DSI
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
DSI
IVV
Healthcare
DSI
IVV
Consumer Defensive
DSI
IVV
Real Estate
DSI
IVV
Basic Materials
DSI
IVV
Energy
DSI
IVV
Utilities
DSI
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DSI vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
DSI
IVV
DSI vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DSI | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.33 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 2.52 | -0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.57 | 11.21 | -2.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DSI vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DSI drawdown since its inception was -54.23%, roughly equal to the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSI and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DSI | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.23% | -55.25% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.05% | -8.89% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.58% | -18.75% | -1.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.36% | -24.53% | -3.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.10% | -33.90% | -0.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.66% | -3.20% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.51% | -10.76% | +3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 2.00% | +0.69% |
Volatility
DSI vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) has a higher volatility of 5.58% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 4.86%. This indicates that DSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DSI | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.58% | 4.86% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | 9.81% | +1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.76% | 12.44% | +1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 16.98% | +1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 18.06% | +0.67% |
DSI vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DSI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DSI vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
DSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than IVV's 1.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSI iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF | 0.89% | 0.92% | 1.03% | 1.19% | 1.39% | 0.99% | 1.22% | 1.40% | 1.63% | 1.28% | 1.51% | 1.46% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.11% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, DSI and IVV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DSI has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to IVV (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSI dropped -54.23% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.57% vs 15.48% for DSI. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 4.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.57% return vs 15.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DSI.
IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.89% for DSI.
DSI is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. DSI tracks MSCI KLD 400 Social Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DSI and 0.03% for IVV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DSI and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer