PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSI vs. ESGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DSI vs. ESGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) and Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSI achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly higher than ESGV's 7.75% return.


DSI

1D
-1.53%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
8.47%
6M
7.30%
1Y
24.79%
3Y*
20.37%
5Y*
12.35%
10Y*
15.50%

ESGV

1D
-1.50%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
7.75%
6M
6.70%
1Y
23.45%
3Y*
20.58%
5Y*
11.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSI vs. ESGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DSI
iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF
8.47%18.03%22.38%28.51%-21.71%31.32%20.94%31.15%-12.07%
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
7.75%16.48%24.69%30.79%-24.04%26.55%25.69%33.36%-14.45%

Correlation

The correlation between DSI and ESGV is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2018

0.98

The correlation between DSI and ESGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

DSI vs. ESGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DSI
ESGV

Technology

43.1%
43.0%

Communication Services

12.8%
12.2%

Financial Services

10.1%
11.4%

Industrials

8.0%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
11.7%

Healthcare

7.0%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
3.6%

Real Estate

2.6%
2.6%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.8%

Energy

1.5%
0.1%

Utilities

0.9%
0.2%

Technology

DSI
43.1%
ESGV
43.0%

Communication Services

DSI
12.8%
ESGV
12.2%

Financial Services

DSI
10.1%
ESGV
11.4%

Industrials

DSI
8.0%
ESGV
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DSI
8.0%
ESGV
11.7%

Healthcare

DSI
7.0%
ESGV
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

DSI
4.0%
ESGV
3.6%

Real Estate

DSI
2.6%
ESGV
2.6%

Basic Materials

DSI
2.2%
ESGV
1.8%

Energy

DSI
1.5%
ESGV
0.1%

Utilities

DSI
0.9%
ESGV
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DSI vs. ESGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSI
DSI Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
DSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSI Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSI Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

ESGV
ESGV Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
ESGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGV Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGV Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSI vs. ESGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) and Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DSIESGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.30

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.03

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.27

8.48

+0.79

DSI vs. ESGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the ESGV Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSI and ESGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DSI vs. ESGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSI drawdown since its inception was -54.23%, which is greater than ESGV's maximum drawdown of -33.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSI and ESGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DSIESGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.23%

-33.66%

-20.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.05%

-11.60%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.58%

-20.41%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.36%

-28.81%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.50%

-3.56%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.51%

-6.40%

-1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.77%

-0.09%

Volatility

DSI vs. ESGV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) and Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) have volatilities of 5.59% and 5.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DSIESGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

5.61%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.08%

11.26%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.79%

14.15%

-0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.04%

18.48%

-0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.73%

20.60%

-1.87%

DSI vs. ESGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ESGV's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DSI vs. ESGV - Dividend Comparison

DSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, which matches ESGV's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DSI
iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF
0.89%0.92%1.03%1.19%1.39%0.99%1.22%1.40%1.63%1.28%1.51%1.46%
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
0.89%0.91%1.04%1.16%1.42%0.95%1.11%1.27%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, DSI and ESGV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ESGV has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to DSI (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSI dropped -54.23% vs ESGV's -33.66%.

On 5-year performance, DSI leads with 12.35% vs 11.61% for ESGV. On fees, ESGV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DSI has performed better with a 12.35% return vs 11.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESGV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DSI.

DSI and ESGV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.89%.

DSI is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ESGV is Large Cap Blend Equities. DSI tracks MSCI KLD 400 Social Index, while ESGV tracks FTSE US All Cap Choice Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DSI and 0.09% for ESGV.

DSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DSI and ESGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer