DSEP vs. AMZP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DSEP (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - September) and AMZP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF) are both Options Trading funds. DSEP is passively managed, while AMZP is actively managed. Over the past year, DSEP returned 13.08% vs 11.65% for AMZP. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DSEP charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMZP.

Performance

DSEP vs. AMZP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - September (DSEP) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSEP achieves a 4.88% return, which is significantly higher than AMZP's -2.19% return.

DSEP

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: 4.88%
• 6M: 4.56%
• 1Y: 13.08%
• 3Y*: 11.80%
• 5Y*: 7.91%
• 10Y*: —

AMZP

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -13.35%
• YTD: -2.19%
• 6M: -2.18%
• 1Y: 11.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSEP vs. AMZP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DSEP FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - September	4.88%	10.75%	11.29%	5.78%
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF	-2.19%	9.56%	37.42%	7.73%

Correlation

The correlation between DSEP and AMZP is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2023	0.63

The correlation between DSEP and AMZP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DSEP vs. AMZP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSEP

DSEP Risk / Return Rank: 77
DSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
DSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
DSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 82
DSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
DSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 80

AMZP

AMZP Risk / Return Rank: 14
AMZP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
AMZP Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
AMZP Omega Ratio Rank: 15
AMZP Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
AMZP Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSEP vs. AMZP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - September (DSEP) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DSEP	AMZP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	0.39	+1.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.24	0.73	+2.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.09	+0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	0.50	+2.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.18	1.21	+12.97

DSEP vs. AMZP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSEP Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the AMZP Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSEP and AMZP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DSEP vs. AMZP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSEP drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, smaller than the maximum AMZP drawdown of -27.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSEP and AMZP.

Drawdown Indicators

	DSEP	AMZP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.78%	-27.36%	+15.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.54%	-23.64%	+19.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-16.53%	+15.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.84%	-6.16%	+4.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.92%	9.67%	-8.75%

Volatility

DSEP vs. AMZP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - September (DSEP) is 1.77%, while Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) has a volatility of 10.66%. This indicates that DSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DSEP	AMZP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.77%	10.66%	-8.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.76%	23.61%	-18.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.93%	30.20%	-24.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.78%	27.14%	-19.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.47%	27.14%	-19.67%

DSEP vs. AMZP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSEP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZP's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

DSEP vs. AMZP - Dividend Comparison

DSEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMZP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.90%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF	20.90%	22.04%	15.15%	2.45%
DSEP FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - September	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DSEP and AMZP in my portfolio?

DSEP and AMZP have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DSEP or AMZP?

AMZP has higher volatility (10.66%) compared to DSEP (1.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSEP dropped -11.78% vs AMZP's -27.36%.

Which ETF is better, DSEP or AMZP?

On 1-year performance, DSEP leads with 13.08% vs 11.65% for AMZP. On fees, DSEP is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, DSEP has been the lower-risk option at 1.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DSEP or AMZP?

Over the 1-year period, DSEP has performed better with a 13.08% return vs 11.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DSEP or AMZP?

DSEP is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DSEP or AMZP?

AMZP has the higher dividend yield at 20.90%, compared with 0.00% for DSEP.

What is the main difference between DSEP and AMZP?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DSEP and 0.99% for AMZP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DSEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.