DSCO vs. MBSX
DSCO (DoubleLine Securitized Credit ETF) and MBSX (Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DSCO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for MBSX.
Performance
DSCO vs. MBSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DSCO
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MBSX
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- 6M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 2.26%
- 1Y
- 8.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DSCO vs. MBSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DSCO DoubleLine Securitized Credit ETF | 1.17% |
MBSX Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF | 1.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between DSCO and MBSX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DSCO vs. MBSX — Risk / Return Rank
DSCO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MBSX
DSCO vs. MBSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Securitized Credit ETF (DSCO) and Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF (MBSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DSCO | MBSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.11 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.29 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.84 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DSCO vs. MBSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DSCO drawdown since its inception was -1.64%, smaller than the maximum MBSX drawdown of -27.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSCO and MBSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DSCO | MBSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.64% | -27.57% | +25.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -27.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -23.51% | +23.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.62% | -7.27% | +6.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.53% | — |
Volatility
DSCO vs. MBSX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DSCO | MBSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 52.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.44% | 55.10% | -52.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.44% | 54.10% | -51.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.44% | 54.10% | -51.66% |
DSCO vs. MBSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DSCO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MBSX's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
DSCO vs. MBSX - Dividend Comparison
DSCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than MBSX's 3.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DSCO DoubleLine Securitized Credit ETF | 2.26% | 0.00% |
MBSX Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF | 3.58% | 2.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DSCO and MBSX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MBSX is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MBSX is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DSCO.
MBSX has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 2.26% for DSCO.
They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and Regan. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DSCO and 0.40% for MBSX.
Find the right allocation for DSCO and MBSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer