DSCO vs. CMBS
DSCO (DoubleLine Securitized Credit ETF) and CMBS (iShares CMBS ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. DSCO is actively managed, while CMBS is passively managed. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DSCO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CMBS.
Performance
DSCO vs. CMBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DSCO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CMBS
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 3.35%
- 3Y*
- 5.35%
- 5Y*
- 0.56%
- 10Y*
- 1.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
CMBS iShares CMBS ETF | $1.41M | $1.26M | $1.86M |
| $3.41M | $2.41M | $1.73M |
DSCO vs. CMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DSCO DoubleLine Securitized Credit ETF | 1.27% |
CMBS iShares CMBS ETF | -0.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between DSCO and CMBS is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DSCO vs. CMBS — Risk / Return Rank
DSCO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CMBS
DSCO vs. CMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Securitized Credit ETF (DSCO) and iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DSCO | CMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.16 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.38 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.27 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DSCO vs. CMBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DSCO drawdown since its inception was -1.64%, smaller than the maximum CMBS drawdown of -15.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSCO and CMBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DSCO | CMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.64% | -15.87% | +14.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -1.63% | +1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.57% | -2.94% | +2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.03% | — |
Volatility
DSCO vs. CMBS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DSCO | CMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42% | 3.64% | -1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.42% | 5.33% | -2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.42% | 5.76% | -3.34% |
DSCO vs. CMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DSCO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CMBS's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DSCO vs. CMBS - Dividend Comparison
DSCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than CMBS's 3.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMBS iShares CMBS ETF | 3.61% | 3.45% | 3.31% | 2.97% | 2.65% | 2.46% | 2.83% | 2.74% | 2.70% | 2.50% | 2.29% | 2.31% |
DSCO DoubleLine Securitized Credit ETF | 2.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DSCO and CMBS have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMBS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMBS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DSCO.
CMBS has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 2.26% for DSCO.
They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DSCO and 0.25% for CMBS.
Find the right allocation for DSCO and CMBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer