PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSCLX vs. DFSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DSCLX vs. DFSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA International Social Core Equity Portfolio (DSCLX) and DFA U.S. Small Cap Portfolio (DFSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSCLX achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly lower than DFSTX's 14.69% return. Over the past 10 years, DSCLX has underperformed DFSTX with an annualized return of 9.83%, while DFSTX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.93% annualized return.


DSCLX

1D
0.33%
1M
4.38%
YTD
11.12%
6M
14.45%
1Y
28.66%
3Y*
20.58%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*
9.83%

DFSTX

1D
0.76%
1M
3.51%
YTD
14.69%
6M
13.91%
1Y
29.09%
3Y*
16.25%
5Y*
8.13%
10Y*
10.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSCLX vs. DFSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DSCLX
DFA International Social Core Equity Portfolio
11.12%37.80%4.92%18.46%-16.62%13.39%7.53%21.13%-17.38%27.65%
DFSTX
DFA U.S. Small Cap Portfolio
14.69%8.07%11.50%17.66%-13.50%30.50%11.19%21.78%-13.20%11.19%

Correlation

The correlation between DSCLX and DFSTX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.72

The correlation between DSCLX and DFSTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DSCLX vs. DFSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSCLX
DSCLX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
DSCLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSCLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSCLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
DSCLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSCLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

DFSTX
DFSTX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
DFSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSCLX vs. DFSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA International Social Core Equity Portfolio (DSCLX) and DFA U.S. Small Cap Portfolio (DFSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DSCLXDFSTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.92

1.87

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.69

2.73

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.32

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

3.42

-1.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.18

11.58

-2.40

DSCLX vs. DFSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSCLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the DFSTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSCLX and DFSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DSCLXDFSTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

1.87

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.40

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.50

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.50

+0.02

Drawdowns

DSCLX vs. DFSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSCLX drawdown since its inception was -42.26%, smaller than the maximum DFSTX drawdown of -60.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSCLX and DFSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DSCLXDFSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.26%

-60.99%

+18.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.93%

-9.16%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.73%

-25.91%

+13.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.15%

-25.91%

-6.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.26%

-44.78%

+2.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

0.00%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.22%

-8.77%

+0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

2.69%

+0.34%

Volatility

DSCLX vs. DFSTX - Volatility Comparison

DFA International Social Core Equity Portfolio (DSCLX) and DFA U.S. Small Cap Portfolio (DFSTX) have volatilities of 4.44% and 4.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DSCLXDFSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

4.45%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.79%

11.57%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.59%

16.76%

-2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

20.56%

-4.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.55%

22.08%

-5.53%

DSCLX vs. DFSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DSCLX and DFSTX have an expense ratio of 0.27%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DSCLX vs. DFSTX - Dividend Comparison

DSCLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than DFSTX's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSTX
DFA U.S. Small Cap Portfolio
0.95%1.08%1.05%2.45%5.18%6.39%1.08%3.30%5.16%4.56%3.10%5.90%
DSCLX
DFA International Social Core Equity Portfolio
3.04%3.38%3.48%3.17%2.73%3.53%1.80%2.91%2.77%2.45%2.75%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


DSCLX and DFSTX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFSTX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to DSCLX (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSCLX dropped -42.26% vs DFSTX's -60.99%.

DSCLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DSCLX and DFSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer