PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DS2P.L vs. EMD5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DS2P.L vs. EMD5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DS2P.L) and L&G Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMD5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DS2P.L is traded in GBp, while EMD5.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMD5.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DS2P.L achieves a -11.00% return, which is significantly lower than EMD5.L's -1.42% return.


DS2P.L

1D
0.56%
1M
-1.79%
6M
-1.11%
YTD
-11.00%
1Y
-7.47%
3Y*
-24.32%
5Y*
-20.16%
10Y*
-23.39%

EMD5.L

1D
-0.99%
1M
-2.04%
6M
0.33%
YTD
-1.42%
1Y
2.76%
3Y*
5.94%
5Y*
2.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DS2P.L vs. EMD5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DS2P.L
L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-11.00%-29.68%-28.35%-29.73%13.75%-35.96%-6.81%
EMD5.L
L&G Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-1.42%2.30%10.30%2.45%0.24%0.67%-0.87%

Correlation

The correlation between DS2P.L and EMD5.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DS2P.L vs. EMD5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DS2P.L
DS2P.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
DS2P.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DS2P.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DS2P.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
DS2P.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
DS2P.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

EMD5.L
EMD5.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
EMD5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMD5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMD5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
EMD5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMD5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DS2P.L vs. EMD5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DS2P.L) and L&G Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMD5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DS2P.LEMD5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.07

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

0.37

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.58

0.91

-1.50

DS2P.L vs. EMD5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DS2P.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the EMD5.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DS2P.L and EMD5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DS2P.L vs. EMD5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DS2P.L drawdown since its inception was -99.62%, which is greater than EMD5.L's maximum drawdown of -12.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DS2P.L and EMD5.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DS2P.LEMD5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.62%

-12.98%

-86.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.26%

-6.62%

-20.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.63%

-7.39%

-60.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.85%

-12.98%

-65.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.59%

-3.43%

-96.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.22%

-4.59%

-84.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.82%

2.71%

+10.11%

Volatility

DS2P.L vs. EMD5.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DS2P.L) has a higher volatility of 9.45% compared to L&G Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMD5.L) at 2.12%. This indicates that DS2P.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMD5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DS2P.LEMD5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.45%

2.12%

+7.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.11%

5.37%

+22.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.11%

6.74%

+27.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.73%

8.09%

+28.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.73%

7.96%

+30.77%

DS2P.L vs. EMD5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DS2P.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EMD5.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

DS2P.L vs. EMD5.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither DS2P.L nor EMD5.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DS2P.L
L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EMD5.L
L&G Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.00%5.66%6.09%4.60%3.04%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


DS2P.L and EMD5.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMD5.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMD5.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DS2P.L.

DS2P.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EMD5.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. DS2P.L tracks ShortDAX x2 Index Gross TR EUR, while EMD5.L tracks J.P. Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified Short-Term Custom Maturity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DS2P.L and 0.25% for EMD5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DS2P.L and EMD5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer