DRVG.L vs. XLKS.L
DRVG.L (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing) and XLKS.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both Technology Equities funds - DRVG.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD while XLKS.L tracks the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DRVG.L returned 18.40%/yr vs 34.36%/yr for XLKS.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRVG.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKS.L.
Performance
DRVG.L vs. XLKS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DRVG.L is traded in GBP, while XLKS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLKS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRVG.L achieves a 42.32% return, which is significantly higher than XLKS.L's 26.93% return.
DRVG.L
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 13.93%
- YTD
- 42.32%
- 6M
- 42.97%
- 1Y
- 94.73%
- 3Y*
- 18.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLKS.L
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 18.72%
- YTD
- 26.93%
- 6M
- 25.46%
- 1Y
- 58.55%
- 3Y*
- 34.36%
- 5Y*
- 27.19%
- 10Y*
- 27.64%
DRVG.L vs. XLKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRVG.L Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 42.32% | 20.43% | -4.12% | 19.60% | -26.53% | -3.79% |
XLKS.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 26.93% | 15.38% | 44.20% | 52.61% | -20.70% | 2.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRVG.L and XLKS.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2021 | 0.69 |
The correlation between DRVG.L and XLKS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
DRVG.L vs. XLKS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRVG.L
XLKS.L
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
DRVG.L
XLKS.L
Consumer Cyclical
DRVG.L
XLKS.L
-
Industrials
DRVG.L
XLKS.L
Basic Materials
DRVG.L
XLKS.L
-
Communication Services
DRVG.L
XLKS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
DRVG.L
-
XLKS.L
-
Energy
DRVG.L
-
XLKS.L
-
Financial Services
DRVG.L
-
XLKS.L
Healthcare
DRVG.L
-
XLKS.L
-
Real Estate
DRVG.L
-
XLKS.L
-
Utilities
DRVG.L
-
XLKS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRVG.L vs. XLKS.L — Risk / Return Rank
DRVG.L
XLKS.L
DRVG.L vs. XLKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRVG.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.48 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.03 | 3.44 | +5.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.73 | 8.81 | +16.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRVG.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.19 | 2.90 | +1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 1.11 | -0.81 |
Drawdowns
DRVG.L vs. XLKS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRVG.L drawdown since its inception was -40.24%, which is greater than XLKS.L's maximum drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRVG.L and XLKS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRVG.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.24% | -28.80% | -11.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.43% | -16.92% | +6.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.13% | -28.80% | -5.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -0.59% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.79% | -4.71% | -13.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 6.63% | -2.96% |
Volatility
DRVG.L vs. XLKS.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L) has a higher volatility of 9.19% compared to Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L) at 7.02%. This indicates that DRVG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRVG.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.19% | 7.02% | +2.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.39% | 15.19% | +1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.54% | 20.20% | +2.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.06% | 23.01% | +2.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.06% | 22.09% | +2.97% |
DRVG.L vs. XLKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRVG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKS.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRVG.L vs. XLKS.L - Dividend Comparison
DRVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while XLKS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRVG.L Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 0.43% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
XLKS.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRVG.L and XLKS.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DRVG.L.
DRVG.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while XLKS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DRVG.L and 0.14% for XLKS.L.
Find the right allocation for DRVG.L and XLKS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer