DRVG.L vs. RBTX.L
DRVG.L (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing) and RBTX.L (iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRVG.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while RBTX.L is a Robotics fund tracking the iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DRVG.L returned 18.40%/yr vs 18.88%/yr for RBTX.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DRVG.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RBTX.L.
Performance
DRVG.L vs. RBTX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DRVG.L is traded in GBP, while RBTX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the RBTX.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRVG.L achieves a 42.32% return, which is significantly higher than RBTX.L's 29.45% return.
DRVG.L
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 13.93%
- YTD
- 42.32%
- 6M
- 42.97%
- 1Y
- 94.73%
- 3Y*
- 18.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RBTX.L
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 12.32%
- YTD
- 29.45%
- 6M
- 27.95%
- 1Y
- 48.70%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 11.98%
- 10Y*
- —
DRVG.L vs. RBTX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRVG.L Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 42.32% | 20.43% | -4.12% | 19.60% | -26.53% | -3.79% |
RBTX.L iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF | 29.45% | 9.17% | 7.51% | 32.05% | -26.55% | -2.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRVG.L and RBTX.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2021 | 0.82 |
The correlation between DRVG.L and RBTX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
DRVG.L vs. RBTX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRVG.L
RBTX.L
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
DRVG.L
RBTX.L
Consumer Cyclical
DRVG.L
RBTX.L
Industrials
DRVG.L
RBTX.L
Basic Materials
DRVG.L
RBTX.L
Communication Services
DRVG.L
RBTX.L
-
Consumer Defensive
DRVG.L
-
RBTX.L
-
Energy
DRVG.L
-
RBTX.L
-
Financial Services
DRVG.L
-
RBTX.L
-
Healthcare
DRVG.L
-
RBTX.L
Real Estate
DRVG.L
-
RBTX.L
-
Utilities
DRVG.L
-
RBTX.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRVG.L vs. RBTX.L — Risk / Return Rank
DRVG.L
RBTX.L
DRVG.L vs. RBTX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRVG.L | RBTX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.40 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.03 | 3.70 | +5.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.73 | 10.95 | +14.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRVG.L | RBTX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.19 | 2.32 | +1.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.78 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
DRVG.L vs. RBTX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRVG.L drawdown since its inception was -40.24%, which is greater than RBTX.L's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRVG.L and RBTX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRVG.L | RBTX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.24% | -33.46% | -6.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.43% | -13.10% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.13% | -27.28% | -6.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | 0.00% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.79% | -8.25% | -9.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 4.43% | -0.76% |
Volatility
DRVG.L vs. RBTX.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L) has a higher volatility of 9.19% compared to iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L) at 7.32%. This indicates that DRVG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBTX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRVG.L | RBTX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.19% | 7.32% | +1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.39% | 16.34% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.54% | 20.91% | +1.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.06% | 21.16% | +3.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.06% | 20.70% | +4.36% |
DRVG.L vs. RBTX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRVG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RBTX.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRVG.L vs. RBTX.L - Dividend Comparison
DRVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while RBTX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRVG.L Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 0.43% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
RBTX.L iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRVG.L and RBTX.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RBTX.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RBTX.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DRVG.L.
DRVG.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while RBTX.L is Robotics. DRVG.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while RBTX.L tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DRVG.L and 0.40% for RBTX.L.
Find the right allocation for DRVG.L and RBTX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer