PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRVG.L vs. MKUW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRVG.L vs. MKUW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L) and Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc (MKUW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DRVG.L is traded in GBP, while MKUW.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MKUW.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRVG.L achieves a 19.59% return, which is significantly higher than MKUW.L's -0.60% return.


DRVG.L

1D
-1.68%
1M
-12.59%
6M
10.16%
YTD
19.59%
1Y
45.72%
3Y*
9.97%
5Y*
10Y*

MKUW.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.73%
6M
-0.15%
YTD
-0.60%
1Y
1.89%
3Y*
6.64%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRVG.L vs. MKUW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DRVG.L
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing
19.59%20.54%-3.43%20.49%-26.05%-29.03%
MKUW.L
Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc
-0.60%16.42%11.06%-13.43%18.60%-5.04%

Correlation

The correlation between DRVG.L and MKUW.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRVG.L vs. MKUW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRVG.L
DRVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DRVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
DRVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

MKUW.L
MKUW.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MKUW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MKUW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
MKUW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
MKUW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MKUW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRVG.L vs. MKUW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L) and Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc (MKUW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRVG.LMKUW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.06

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

0.37

+2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.99

0.98

+8.01

DRVG.L vs. MKUW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRVG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the MKUW.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRVG.L and MKUW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRVG.L vs. MKUW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRVG.L drawdown since its inception was -54.13%, which is greater than MKUW.L's maximum drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRVG.L and MKUW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRVG.LMKUW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.13%

-33.94%

-20.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.53%

-8.77%

-7.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.63%

-9.57%

-24.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.46%

-4.11%

-12.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.80%

-10.63%

-25.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.07%

3.35%

+1.72%

Volatility

DRVG.L vs. MKUW.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L) has a higher volatility of 10.00% compared to Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc (MKUW.L) at 2.17%. This indicates that DRVG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MKUW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRVG.LMKUW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.00%

2.17%

+7.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.33%

9.17%

+11.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.30%

11.76%

+13.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.11%

14.38%

+13.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.11%

17.70%

+10.41%

DRVG.L vs. MKUW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DRVG.L and MKUW.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

DRVG.L vs. MKUW.L - Dividend Comparison

DRVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, while MKUW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DRVG.L
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing
0.63%0.94%1.38%0.83%0.67%
MKUW.L
Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRVG.L and MKUW.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRVG.L and MKUW.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

DRVG.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while MKUW.L tracks Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRVG.L and MKUW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer