PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRVG.L vs. FOGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRVG.L vs. FOGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L) and Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DRVG.L is traded in GBP, while FOGB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FOGB.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRVG.L achieves a 19.59% return, which is significantly higher than FOGB.L's 3.33% return.


DRVG.L

1D
-1.68%
1M
-12.59%
6M
10.16%
YTD
19.59%
1Y
45.72%
3Y*
9.97%
5Y*
10Y*

FOGB.L

1D
-0.47%
1M
0.62%
6M
-1.77%
YTD
3.33%
1Y
-4.66%
3Y*
-5.08%
5Y*
-8.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRVG.L vs. FOGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DRVG.L
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing
19.59%20.54%-3.43%20.49%-26.05%-29.03%
FOGB.L
Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD
3.33%-9.49%-5.72%-6.98%-18.26%-5.19%

Correlation

The correlation between DRVG.L and FOGB.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between DRVG.L and FOGB.L has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRVG.L vs. FOGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRVG.L
DRVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DRVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
DRVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FOGB.L
FOGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FOGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FOGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRVG.L vs. FOGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L) and Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRVG.LFOGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

0.98

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

-0.25

+3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.99

-0.41

+9.40

DRVG.L vs. FOGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRVG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the FOGB.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRVG.L and FOGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRVG.L vs. FOGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRVG.L drawdown since its inception was -54.13%, which is greater than FOGB.L's maximum drawdown of -43.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRVG.L and FOGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRVG.LFOGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.13%

-43.46%

-10.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.53%

-12.73%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.63%

-23.44%

-10.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.46%

-38.99%

+22.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.80%

-24.51%

-11.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.07%

7.79%

-2.72%

Volatility

DRVG.L vs. FOGB.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L) has a higher volatility of 10.00% compared to Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOGB.L) at 4.25%. This indicates that DRVG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRVG.LFOGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.00%

4.25%

+5.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.33%

11.01%

+9.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.30%

15.10%

+10.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.11%

15.83%

+12.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.11%

15.43%

+12.68%

DRVG.L vs. FOGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRVG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FOGB.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRVG.L vs. FOGB.L - Dividend Comparison

DRVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, while FOGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DRVG.L
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing
0.63%0.94%1.38%0.83%0.67%
FOGB.L
Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRVG.L and FOGB.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FOGB.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FOGB.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DRVG.L.

DRVG.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while FOGB.L tracks Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Rize ETF. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DRVG.L and 0.45% for FOGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRVG.L and FOGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer