PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRVE.L vs. XFSN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRVE.L vs. XFSN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DRVE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFSN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DRVE.L is traded in USD, while XFSN.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XFSN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRVE.L achieves a 42.61% return, which is significantly higher than XFSN.L's -3.70% return.


DRVE.L

1D
-0.78%
1M
12.44%
YTD
42.61%
6M
43.87%
1Y
94.06%
3Y*
22.09%
5Y*
10Y*

XFSN.L

1D
-2.42%
1M
5.36%
YTD
-3.70%
6M
-4.32%
1Y
-1.94%
3Y*
16.45%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRVE.L vs. XFSN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DRVE.L
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
42.61%29.05%-5.06%27.62%-11.35%
XFSN.L
Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C
-3.70%10.70%32.64%27.77%-6.36%

Correlation

The correlation between DRVE.L and XFSN.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2022

0.64

The correlation between DRVE.L and XFSN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRVE.L vs. XFSN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRVE.L
DRVE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DRVE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

XFSN.L
XFSN.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
XFSN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFSN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFSN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XFSN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFSN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRVE.L vs. XFSN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DRVE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFSN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRVE.LXFSN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

0.99

+0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.76

-0.08

+7.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.76

-0.17

+23.94

DRVE.L vs. XFSN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRVE.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.84, which is higher than the XFSN.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRVE.L and XFSN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRVE.LXFSN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.84

-0.12

+3.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.72

-0.45

Drawdowns

DRVE.L vs. XFSN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRVE.L drawdown since its inception was -41.48%, which is greater than XFSN.L's maximum drawdown of -24.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRVE.L and XFSN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRVE.LXFSN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.48%

-24.74%

-16.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.05%

-24.74%

+12.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.23%

-24.74%

-8.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-11.89%

+11.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.63%

-6.00%

-14.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.94%

11.17%

-7.23%

Volatility

DRVE.L vs. XFSN.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DRVE.L) has a higher volatility of 10.57% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFSN.L) at 4.41%. This indicates that DRVE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XFSN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRVE.LXFSN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.57%

4.41%

+6.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.33%

12.42%

+5.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.39%

16.36%

+8.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.62%

20.26%

+15.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.62%

20.26%

+15.36%

DRVE.L vs. XFSN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRVE.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XFSN.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRVE.L vs. XFSN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither DRVE.L nor XFSN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DRVE.L and XFSN.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XFSN.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XFSN.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DRVE.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DRVE.L and 0.35% for XFSN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRVE.L and XFSN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer