PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRVE.L vs. SILG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRVE.L vs. SILG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DRVE.L) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DRVE.L is traded in USD, while SILG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SILG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRVE.L achieves a 42.61% return, which is significantly higher than SILG.L's 5.00% return.


DRVE.L

1D
-0.78%
1M
12.44%
YTD
42.61%
6M
43.87%
1Y
94.06%
3Y*
22.09%
5Y*
10Y*

SILG.L

1D
-4.31%
1M
0.12%
YTD
5.00%
6M
14.74%
1Y
101.41%
3Y*
49.17%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRVE.L vs. SILG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DRVE.L
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
42.61%29.05%-5.06%27.62%-17.43%
SILG.L
Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
5.00%173.15%11.64%-1.40%-9.85%

Correlation

The correlation between DRVE.L and SILG.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2022

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRVE.L vs. SILG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRVE.L
DRVE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DRVE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

SILG.L
SILG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SILG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SILG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SILG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SILG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SILG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRVE.L vs. SILG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DRVE.L) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRVE.LSILG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.30

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.76

3.14

+4.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.76

7.62

+16.14

DRVE.L vs. SILG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRVE.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.84, which is higher than the SILG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRVE.L and SILG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRVE.LSILG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.84

1.97

+1.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.69

-0.42

Drawdowns

DRVE.L vs. SILG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRVE.L drawdown since its inception was -41.48%, which is greater than SILG.L's maximum drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRVE.L and SILG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRVE.LSILG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.48%

-31.97%

-9.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.05%

-31.97%

+19.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.23%

-31.97%

-1.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-25.53%

+24.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.63%

-13.19%

-7.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.94%

13.21%

-9.27%

Volatility

DRVE.L vs. SILG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DRVE.L) is 10.57%, while Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L) has a volatility of 19.21%. This indicates that DRVE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRVE.LSILG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.57%

19.21%

-8.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.33%

41.57%

-23.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.39%

51.03%

-26.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.62%

42.63%

-7.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.62%

42.63%

-7.01%

DRVE.L vs. SILG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRVE.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SILG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRVE.L vs. SILG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither DRVE.L nor SILG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DRVE.L and SILG.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DRVE.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRVE.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SILG.L.

DRVE.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while SILG.L is Silver. DRVE.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while SILG.L tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DRVE.L and 0.65% for SILG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRVE.L and SILG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer