PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRVE.L vs. QWTM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRVE.L vs. QWTM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DRVE.L) and WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc (QWTM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DRVE.L is traded in USD, while QWTM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the QWTM.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRVE.L achieves a 42.61% return, which is significantly lower than QWTM.L's 54.06% return.


DRVE.L

1D
-0.78%
1M
12.44%
YTD
42.61%
6M
43.87%
1Y
94.06%
3Y*
22.09%
5Y*
10Y*

QWTM.L

1D
-2.65%
1M
26.07%
YTD
54.06%
6M
53.56%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRVE.L vs. QWTM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DRVE.L and QWTM.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRVE.L vs. QWTM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRVE.L
DRVE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DRVE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

QWTM.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRVE.L vs. QWTM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DRVE.L) and WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc (QWTM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRVE.LQWTM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.76

DRVE.L vs. QWTM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRVE.LQWTM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

3.22

-2.95

Drawdowns

DRVE.L vs. QWTM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRVE.L drawdown since its inception was -41.48%, which is greater than QWTM.L's maximum drawdown of -25.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRVE.L and QWTM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRVE.LQWTM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.48%

-25.40%

-16.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-2.65%

+1.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.63%

-10.25%

-10.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.94%

Volatility

DRVE.L vs. QWTM.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRVE.LQWTM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.39%

39.83%

-15.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.62%

39.83%

-4.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.62%

39.83%

-4.21%

DRVE.L vs. QWTM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DRVE.L and QWTM.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

DRVE.L vs. QWTM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither DRVE.L nor QWTM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DRVE.L and QWTM.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRVE.L and QWTM.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

DRVE.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while QWTM.L tracks WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and WisdomTree.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRVE.L and QWTM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer