PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRVE.L vs. HERG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRVE.L vs. HERG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DRVE.L) and Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Dist GBP (HERG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DRVE.L is traded in USD, while HERG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HERG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRVE.L achieves a 40.09% return, which is significantly higher than HERG.L's -14.37% return.


DRVE.L

1D
-1.76%
1M
8.58%
YTD
40.09%
6M
39.52%
1Y
88.02%
3Y*
21.40%
5Y*
10Y*

HERG.L

1D
-1.52%
1M
-4.37%
YTD
-14.37%
6M
-16.01%
1Y
-15.33%
3Y*
7.80%
5Y*
-5.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRVE.L vs. HERG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DRVE.L
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
40.09%29.05%-5.06%27.62%-34.64%-1.80%
HERG.L
Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Dist GBP
-14.37%23.78%18.64%5.42%-35.28%-8.55%

Correlation

The correlation between DRVE.L and HERG.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2021

0.50

The correlation between DRVE.L and HERG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

DRVE.L vs. HERG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DRVE.L
HERG.L

Technology

34.0%
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

26.8%

-

Industrials

19.4%
2.0%

Basic Materials

14.4%

-

Communication Services

5.4%
92.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

DRVE.L
34.0%
HERG.L
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DRVE.L
26.8%
HERG.L

-

Industrials

DRVE.L
19.4%
HERG.L
2.0%

Basic Materials

DRVE.L
14.4%
HERG.L

-

Communication Services

DRVE.L
5.4%
HERG.L
92.4%

Consumer Defensive

DRVE.L

-

HERG.L

-

Energy

DRVE.L

-

HERG.L

-

Financial Services

DRVE.L

-

HERG.L

-

Healthcare

DRVE.L

-

HERG.L

-

Real Estate

DRVE.L

-

HERG.L

-

Utilities

DRVE.L

-

HERG.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRVE.L vs. HERG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRVE.L
DRVE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DRVE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

HERG.L
HERG.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
HERG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HERG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
HERG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
HERG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
HERG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRVE.L vs. HERG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DRVE.L) and Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Dist GBP (HERG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRVE.LHERG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

0.88

+0.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.27

-0.58

+7.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.22

-1.10

+23.32

DRVE.L vs. HERG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRVE.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.59, which is higher than the HERG.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRVE.L and HERG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRVE.LHERG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.59

-0.81

+4.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

-0.20

+0.45

Drawdowns

DRVE.L vs. HERG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRVE.L drawdown since its inception was -41.48%, smaller than the maximum HERG.L drawdown of -55.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRVE.L and HERG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRVE.LHERG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.48%

-55.77%

+14.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.05%

-26.23%

+14.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.23%

-26.23%

-7.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.52%

-34.86%

+32.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.61%

-34.62%

+14.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

13.95%

-10.00%

Volatility

DRVE.L vs. HERG.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DRVE.L) has a higher volatility of 10.74% compared to Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Dist GBP (HERG.L) at 5.41%. This indicates that DRVE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HERG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRVE.LHERG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.74%

5.41%

+5.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.43%

15.28%

+3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.44%

19.02%

+5.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.61%

22.30%

+13.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.61%

22.48%

+13.13%

DRVE.L vs. HERG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DRVE.L and HERG.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

DRVE.L vs. HERG.L - Dividend Comparison

DRVE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HERG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DRVE.L
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HERG.L
Global X Video Games & Esports UCITS ETF Dist GBP
0.97%0.24%0.37%0.00%0.01%0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRVE.L and HERG.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRVE.L and HERG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRVE.L and HERG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer