PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRV vs. SRVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRV vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV) and Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRV achieves a -33.29% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 6.87% return.


DRV

1D
-5.75%
1M
-5.35%
6M
-26.60%
YTD
-33.29%
1Y
-27.98%
3Y*
-23.26%
5Y*
-16.17%
10Y*
-28.36%

SRVR

1D
-1.78%
1M
-10.64%
6M
0.07%
YTD
6.87%
1Y
-4.54%
3Y*
3.89%
5Y*
-3.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRV vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DRV
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares
-33.29%-7.27%-10.50%-33.74%68.51%-68.77%-60.48%-51.70%-10.49%
SRVR
Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF
6.87%-1.99%2.70%6.84%-31.90%22.31%11.99%41.98%-3.66%

Correlation

The correlation between DRV and SRVR is -0.58, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018

-0.79

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DRV and SRVR has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.79 to -0.58, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRV vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRV
DRV Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
DRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRV Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
DRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRV Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

SRVR
SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRV vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV) and Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRVSRVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.97

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

-0.30

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.65

-0.60

-1.05

DRV vs. SRVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRV Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the SRVR Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRV and SRVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRV vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRV drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than SRVR's maximum drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRV and SRVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRVSRVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-40.99%

-59.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.30%

-14.98%

-20.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.95%

-18.34%

-54.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.28%

-40.99%

-34.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

-21.75%

-78.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-97.76%

-15.27%

-82.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.96%

7.55%

+9.41%

Volatility

DRV vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV) has a higher volatility of 16.05% compared to Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) at 4.22%. This indicates that DRV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRVSRVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.05%

4.22%

+11.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.48%

14.02%

+19.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.02%

17.29%

+25.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.25%

19.85%

+37.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.82%

21.41%

+41.41%

DRV vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRV has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SRVR's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRV vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison

DRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than SRVR's 2.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DRV
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares
4.05%2.88%4.57%5.35%0.38%0.00%0.58%1.71%0.42%
SRVR
Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF
2.86%2.67%2.00%3.69%1.70%1.19%1.59%1.61%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRV and SRVR have a correlation of -0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRV has higher volatility (16.05%) compared to SRVR (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRV dropped -99.99% vs SRVR's -40.99%.

On 5-year performance, SRVR leads with -3.67% vs -16.17% for DRV. On fees, SRVR is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SRVR has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SRVR has performed better with a -3.67% return vs -16.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SRVR is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for DRV.

DRV has the higher dividend yield at 4.05%, compared with 2.86% for SRVR.

DRV tracks MSCI US REIT Index (-300%), while SRVR tracks FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for DRV and 0.49% for SRVR.

SRVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.26 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRV and SRVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer