DRV vs. NVDU
DRV (Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares) and NVDU (Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRV is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US REIT Index (-300%), while NVDU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. DRV is passively managed, while NVDU is actively managed. Over the past year, DRV returned -16.69% vs 84.73% for NVDU. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. DRV charges 1.08%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for NVDU.
Performance
DRV vs. NVDU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRV achieves a -21.17% return, which is significantly lower than NVDU's 19.93% return.
DRV
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- -21.17%
- 6M
- -18.62%
- 1Y
- -16.69%
- 3Y*
- -22.80%
- 5Y*
- -15.28%
- 10Y*
- -28.88%
NVDU
- 1D
- -7.30%
- 1M
- 14.13%
- YTD
- 19.93%
- 6M
- 27.09%
- 1Y
- 84.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRV vs. NVDU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DRV Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares | -21.17% | -7.27% | -10.50% | -32.53% |
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF | 19.93% | 33.65% | 289.29% | 9.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRV and NVDU is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRV vs. NVDU — Risk / Return Rank
DRV
NVDU
DRV vs. NVDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV) and Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRV | NVDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.23 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 2.02 | -2.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | 4.60 | -5.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRV | NVDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 | 1.26 | -1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.68 | 1.14 | -1.82 |
Drawdowns
DRV vs. NVDU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRV drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than NVDU's maximum drawdown of -67.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRV and NVDU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRV | NVDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -67.27% | -32.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.02% | -42.27% | +12.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -18.32% | -81.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -97.77% | -18.84% | -78.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.53% | 18.47% | -4.94% |
Volatility
DRV vs. NVDU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV) is 11.51%, while Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) has a volatility of 24.74%. This indicates that DRV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRV | NVDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.51% | 24.74% | -13.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.83% | 50.50% | -21.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.37% | 68.02% | -27.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.91% | 91.06% | -34.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.65% | 91.06% | -28.41% |
DRV vs. NVDU - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRV has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDU's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRV vs. NVDU - Dividend Comparison
DRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, less than NVDU's 4.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRV Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares | 3.56% | 2.88% | 4.57% | 5.35% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.58% | 1.71% | 0.42% |
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF | 4.83% | 5.68% | 16.85% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRV and NVDU have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDU has higher volatility (24.74%) compared to DRV (11.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRV dropped -99.99% vs NVDU's -67.27%.
On 1-year performance, NVDU leads with 84.73% vs -16.69% for DRV. On fees, NVDU is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, DRV has been the lower-risk option at 11.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVDU has performed better with a 84.73% return vs -16.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDU is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for DRV.
NVDU has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 3.56% for DRV.
DRV is categorized as REIT, while NVDU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for DRV and 1.04% for NVDU.
NVDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRV and NVDU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer