DRV vs. DIVG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DRV (Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares) and DIVG (Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRV is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US REIT Index (-300%), while DIVG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DRV returned -22.15% vs 22.10% for DIVG. At a correlation of -0.75, they often move in opposite directions. DRV charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for DIVG.

Performance

DRV vs. DIVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF (DIVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRV achieves a -29.93% return, which is significantly lower than DIVG's 13.33% return.

DRV

• 1D: -4.91%
• 1M: -4.37%
• YTD: -29.93%
• 6M: -30.51%
• 1Y: -22.15%
• 3Y*: -27.14%
• 5Y*: -17.01%
• 10Y*: -29.40%

DIVG

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: 1.25%
• YTD: 13.33%
• 6M: 13.28%
• 1Y: 22.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRV vs. DIVG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DRV Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares	-29.93%	-7.27%	-10.50%	-17.38%
DIVG Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF	13.33%	11.31%	16.60%	5.71%

Correlation

The correlation between DRV and DIVG is -0.70, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023	-0.75

The correlation between DRV and DIVG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.75 to -0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DRV vs. DIVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRV

DRV Risk / Return Rank: 4
DRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
DRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
DRV Omega Ratio Rank: 5
DRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
DRV Martin Ratio Rank: 1

DIVG

DIVG Risk / Return Rank: 72
DIVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
DIVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
DIVG Omega Ratio Rank: 62
DIVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
DIVG Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRV vs. DIVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF (DIVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DRV	DIVG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.52	2.04	-2.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.56	3.00	-3.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.35	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.68	4.33	-5.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.47	13.76	-15.23

DRV vs. DIVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRV Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the DIVG Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRV and DIVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DRV vs. DIVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRV drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than DIVG's maximum drawdown of -14.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRV and DIVG.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRV	DIVG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.99%	-14.95%	-85.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.86%	-5.13%	-27.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-71.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-74.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-97.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.99%	-0.88%	-99.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-97.75%	-2.25%	-95.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.12%	1.61%	+13.51%

Volatility

DRV vs. DIVG - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV) has a higher volatility of 16.42% compared to Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF (DIVG) at 3.49%. This indicates that DRV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DRV	DIVG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.42%	3.49%	+12.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.89%	7.58%	+24.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.62%	10.87%	+31.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	57.12%	13.18%	+43.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.82%	13.18%	+49.64%

DRV vs. DIVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRV has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVG's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRV vs. DIVG - Dividend Comparison

DRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, more than DIVG's 3.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DIVG Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF	3.06%	3.15%	4.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DRV Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares	4.00%	2.88%	4.57%	5.35%	0.38%	0.00%	0.58%	1.71%	0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRV and DIVG in my portfolio?

DRV and DIVG have a correlation of -0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DRV or DIVG?

DRV has higher volatility (16.42%) compared to DIVG (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRV dropped -99.99% vs DIVG's -14.95%.

Which ETF is better, DRV or DIVG?

On 1-year performance, DIVG leads with 22.10% vs -22.15% for DRV. On fees, DIVG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, DIVG has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DRV or DIVG?

Over the 1-year period, DIVG has performed better with a 22.10% return vs -22.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRV or DIVG?

DIVG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for DRV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRV or DIVG?

DRV has the higher dividend yield at 4.00%, compared with 3.06% for DIVG.

What is the main difference between DRV and DIVG?

DRV is categorized as REIT, while DIVG is S&P 500. DRV tracks MSCI US REIT Index (-300%), while DIVG tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for DRV and 0.39% for DIVG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DIVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.