PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRV vs. BYRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRV vs. BYRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV) and Principal Real Estate Active Opportunities ETF (BYRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRV achieves a -21.02% return, which is significantly lower than BYRE's 10.39% return.


DRV

1D
-1.47%
1M
6.20%
YTD
-21.02%
6M
-18.87%
1Y
-16.17%
3Y*
-22.75%
5Y*
-15.22%
10Y*
-28.87%

BYRE

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.20%
YTD
10.39%
6M
9.59%
1Y
8.51%
3Y*
8.94%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRV vs. BYRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DRV
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares
-21.02%-7.27%-10.50%-33.74%7.22%
BYRE
Principal Real Estate Active Opportunities ETF
10.39%2.35%4.18%10.82%-9.01%

Correlation

The correlation between DRV and BYRE is -0.92, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2022

-0.96

The correlation between DRV and BYRE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.96 to -0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRV vs. BYRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRV
DRV Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
DRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRV Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
DRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRV Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

BYRE
BYRE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BYRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYRE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BYRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYRE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRV vs. BYRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV) and Principal Real Estate Active Opportunities ETF (BYRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRVBYREDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.40

0.69

-1.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.35

1.00

-1.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.13

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

1.09

-1.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.19

2.76

-3.95

DRV vs. BYRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRV Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the BYRE Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRV and BYRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRVBYREDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

0.69

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.68

0.24

-0.92

Drawdowns

DRV vs. BYRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRV drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than BYRE's maximum drawdown of -25.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRV and BYRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRVBYREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-25.70%

-74.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.02%

-7.76%

-22.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.74%

-15.20%

-55.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

-2.99%

-97.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-97.77%

-9.59%

-88.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.45%

3.07%

+10.38%

Volatility

DRV vs. BYRE - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV) has a higher volatility of 11.56% compared to Principal Real Estate Active Opportunities ETF (BYRE) at 3.50%. This indicates that DRV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BYRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRVBYREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.56%

3.50%

+8.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.11%

9.01%

+20.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.37%

12.40%

+27.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.91%

18.11%

+38.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.67%

18.11%

+44.56%

DRV vs. BYRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRV has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than BYRE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRV vs. BYRE - Dividend Comparison

DRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than BYRE's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BYRE
Principal Real Estate Active Opportunities ETF
2.49%2.71%2.31%2.63%1.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DRV
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares
3.55%2.88%4.57%5.35%0.38%0.00%0.58%1.71%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRV and BYRE have a correlation of -0.92, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRV has higher volatility (11.56%) compared to BYRE (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRV dropped -99.99% vs BYRE's -25.70%.

On 3-year performance, BYRE leads with 8.94% vs -22.75% for DRV. On fees, BYRE is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BYRE has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BYRE has performed better with a 8.94% return vs -22.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BYRE is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for DRV.

DRV has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 2.49% for BYRE.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Principal. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for DRV and 0.65% for BYRE.

BYRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRV and BYRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer