DRUP.DE vs. ZPDT.DE
DRUP.DE (Lyxor MSCI Disruptive Technology ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) and ZPDT.DE (SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - DRUP.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI IMI Disruptive Technology ESG Filtered while ZPDT.DE tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRUP.DE returned 8.78%/yr vs 22.38%/yr for ZPDT.DE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRUP.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ZPDT.DE.
Performance
DRUP.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DRUP.DE having a 23.69% return and ZPDT.DE slightly higher at 24.09%.
DRUP.DE
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 13.12%
- YTD
- 23.69%
- 6M
- 20.68%
- 1Y
- 39.91%
- 3Y*
- 19.28%
- 5Y*
- 8.78%
- 10Y*
- —
ZPDT.DE
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- 11.72%
- YTD
- 24.09%
- 6M
- 22.52%
- 1Y
- 48.51%
- 3Y*
- 26.33%
- 5Y*
- 22.38%
- 10Y*
- 24.05%
DRUP.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRUP.DE Lyxor MSCI Disruptive Technology ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc | 23.69% | 9.46% | 20.09% | 21.03% | -31.26% | 10.02% | 48.77% |
ZPDT.DE SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF | 24.09% | 11.31% | 29.30% | 52.02% | -25.52% | 47.48% | 27.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRUP.DE and ZPDT.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2020 | 0.78 |
The correlation between DRUP.DE and ZPDT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRUP.DE vs. ZPDT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DRUP.DE
ZPDT.DE
DRUP.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Disruptive Technology ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (DRUP.DE) and SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRUP.DE | ZPDT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.39 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 3.19 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.29 | 8.35 | -1.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRUP.DE | ZPDT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 2.43 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.99 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 1.03 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
DRUP.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRUP.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.97%, which is greater than ZPDT.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRUP.DE and ZPDT.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRUP.DE | ZPDT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.97% | -31.48% | -6.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.74% | -15.47% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.04% | -29.50% | +3.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.30% | -29.50% | -6.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -3.09% | +1.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.43% | -5.68% | -10.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.61% | 5.91% | -0.30% |
Volatility
DRUP.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI Disruptive Technology ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (DRUP.DE) is 6.32%, while SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDT.DE) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that DRUP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZPDT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRUP.DE | ZPDT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.32% | 7.06% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.63% | 14.78% | -1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.01% | 20.30% | -1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 22.33% | -1.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.27% | 21.38% | -0.11% |
DRUP.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRUP.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPDT.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRUP.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DRUP.DE nor ZPDT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DRUP.DE and ZPDT.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZPDT.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZPDT.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DRUP.DE.
DRUP.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Disruptive Technology ESG Filtered, while ZPDT.DE tracks S&P Technology Select Sector. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DRUP.DE and 0.15% for ZPDT.DE.
Find the right allocation for DRUP.DE and ZPDT.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer