PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRTS vs. ABCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DRTS vs. ABCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Tau Medical Ltd (DRTS) and AbCellera Biologics Inc. (ABCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRTS achieves a 146.06% return, which is significantly higher than ABCL's 90.64% return.


DRTS

1D
-4.17%
1M
23.65%
6M
71.79%
YTD
146.06%
1Y
298.04%
3Y*
44.70%
5Y*
4.51%
10Y*

ABCL

1D
-4.12%
1M
24.43%
6M
44.25%
YTD
90.64%
1Y
62.59%
3Y*
-3.07%
5Y*
-17.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRTS vs. ABCL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DRTS
Alpha Tau Medical Ltd
146.06%59.68%2.99%-5.35%-67.62%-2.77%
ABCL
AbCellera Biologics Inc.
90.64%16.72%-48.69%-43.63%-29.16%-50.02%

Correlation

The correlation between DRTS and ABCL is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2021

0.10

Over the past year, DRTS and ABCL have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DRTS:

$1.10B

ABCL:

$1.99B

EPS

DRTS:

-$0.65

ABCL:

-$0.48

PB Ratio

DRTS:

15.75

ABCL:

2.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

DRTS:

$0.00

ABCL:

$79.21M

Gross Profit (TTM)

DRTS:

$0.00

ABCL:

$70.89M

EBITDA (TTM)

DRTS:

-$45.55M

ABCL:

-$166.07M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Alpha Tau Medical Ltd

AbCellera Biologics Inc.

Return for Risk

DRTS vs. ABCL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRTS
DRTS Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
DRTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRTS Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
DRTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRTS Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

ABCL
ABCL Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ABCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABCL Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ABCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABCL Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRTS vs. ABCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Tau Medical Ltd (DRTS) and AbCellera Biologics Inc. (ABCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRTSABCLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.18

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.58

1.15

+11.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

30.20

2.07

+28.13

DRTS vs. ABCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRTS Sharpe Ratio is 3.92, which is higher than the ABCL Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRTS and ABCL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRTS vs. ABCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRTS drawdown since its inception was -86.86%, smaller than the maximum ABCL drawdown of -96.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRTS and ABCL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRTSABCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.86%

-96.84%

+9.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.87%

-54.94%

+31.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.59%

-75.72%

+23.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.86%

-90.96%

+4.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.39%

-89.31%

+68.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.92%

-84.20%

+27.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.92%

30.29%

-20.37%

Volatility

DRTS vs. ABCL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Tau Medical Ltd (DRTS) is 20.03%, while AbCellera Biologics Inc. (ABCL) has a volatility of 25.44%. This indicates that DRTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRTSABCLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.03%

25.44%

-5.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

60.77%

57.96%

+2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

76.67%

79.28%

-2.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.49%

67.47%

+12.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

76.85%

70.67%

+6.18%

Dividends

DRTS vs. ABCL - Dividend Comparison

Neither DRTS nor ABCL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

DRTS vs. ABCL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alpha Tau Medical Ltd and AbCellera Biologics Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
8.32M
(DRTS) Total Revenue
(ABCL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


DRTS and ABCL have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABCL has higher volatility (25.44%) compared to DRTS (20.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRTS dropped -86.86% vs ABCL's -96.84%.

DRTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRTS and ABCL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer