DRSK vs. NTSE
DRSK (Aptus Defined Risk ETF) and NTSE (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRSK returned 3.13%/yr vs 6.15%/yr for NTSE. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DRSK charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for NTSE.
Performance
DRSK vs. NTSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRSK achieves a 4.10% return, which is significantly lower than NTSE's 30.29% return.
DRSK
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- 8.04%
- 3Y*
- 9.30%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- —
NTSE
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- 30.29%
- 6M
- 33.64%
- 1Y
- 59.40%
- 3Y*
- 24.55%
- 5Y*
- 6.15%
- 10Y*
- —
DRSK vs. NTSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRSK Aptus Defined Risk ETF | 4.10% | 7.67% | 12.50% | 2.08% | -9.57% | -0.35% |
NTSE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund | 30.29% | 36.29% | 4.42% | 9.47% | -26.31% | -5.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRSK and NTSE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021 | 0.49 |
The correlation between DRSK and NTSE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
DRSK vs. NTSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRSK
NTSE
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
DRSK
NTSE
Financial Services
DRSK
NTSE
Communication Services
DRSK
NTSE
Consumer Cyclical
DRSK
NTSE
Healthcare
DRSK
NTSE
Industrials
DRSK
NTSE
Consumer Defensive
DRSK
NTSE
Energy
DRSK
NTSE
Utilities
DRSK
NTSE
Real Estate
DRSK
NTSE
Basic Materials
DRSK
NTSE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRSK vs. NTSE — Risk / Return Rank
DRSK
NTSE
DRSK vs. NTSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRSK | NTSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.53 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 4.21 | -3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.89 | 16.27 | -13.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRSK | NTSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 2.88 | -1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.32 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.37 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
DRSK vs. NTSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRSK drawdown since its inception was -19.87%, smaller than the maximum NTSE drawdown of -42.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRSK and NTSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRSK | NTSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.87% | -42.84% | +22.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.20% | -14.20% | +7.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.60% | -18.73% | +9.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.87% | -42.84% | +22.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -2.47% | +1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.21% | -19.72% | +15.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 3.66% | -0.87% |
Volatility
DRSK vs. NTSE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) is 2.97%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) has a volatility of 9.12%. This indicates that DRSK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRSK | NTSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 9.12% | -6.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.19% | 18.25% | -13.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.26% | 20.79% | -12.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.39% | 19.26% | -11.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.06% | 19.24% | -12.18% |
DRSK vs. NTSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRSK has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSE's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRSK vs. NTSE - Dividend Comparison
DRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than NTSE's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRSK Aptus Defined Risk ETF | 3.61% | 3.67% | 3.31% | 3.57% | 1.93% | 2.64% | 5.69% | 3.04% | 2.62% |
NTSE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund | 2.54% | 3.35% | 3.23% | 2.44% | 3.22% | 2.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRSK and NTSE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NTSE has higher volatility (9.12%) compared to DRSK (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRSK dropped -19.87% vs NTSE's -42.84%.
On 5-year performance, NTSE leads with 6.15% vs 3.13% for DRSK. On fees, NTSE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DRSK has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NTSE has performed better with a 6.15% return vs 3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NTSE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DRSK.
DRSK has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 2.54% for NTSE.
They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DRSK and 0.38% for NTSE.
NTSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRSK and NTSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer