PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRSK vs. JUCY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRSK vs. JUCY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) and Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF (JUCY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRSK achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than JUCY's 3.47% return.


DRSK

1D
0.28%
1M
-1.04%
6M
1.95%
YTD
1.59%
1Y
3.00%
3Y*
7.99%
5Y*
2.33%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.25%

JUCY

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.35%
6M
3.05%
YTD
3.47%
1Y
7.00%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.84M$3.85M$3.25M
$1.59M$4.38M$2.12M

DRSK vs. JUCY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DRSK
Aptus Defined Risk ETF
1.59%7.67%12.50%2.08%2.56%
JUCY
Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF
3.47%5.50%3.89%3.27%0.54%

Correlation

The correlation between DRSK and JUCY is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2022

0.10

Over the past year, DRSK and JUCY have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRSK vs. JUCY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DRSK
DRSK Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
DRSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRSK Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
DRSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRSK Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

JUCY
JUCY Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
JUCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUCY Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
JUCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUCY Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DRSK vs. JUCY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) and Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF (JUCY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRSKJUCYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.42

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

7.71

-7.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.22

30.17

-28.95

DRSK vs. JUCY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRSK Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the JUCY Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRSK and JUCY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRSK vs. JUCY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRSK drawdown since its inception was -19.87%, which is greater than JUCY's maximum drawdown of -1.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRSK and JUCY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRSKJUCYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.87%

-1.56%

-18.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.20%

-0.94%

-6.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.81%

-1.56%

-7.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.30%

-0.08%

-3.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.18%

-0.32%

-3.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

0.24%

+2.70%

Volatility

DRSK vs. JUCY - Volatility Comparison

Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) has a higher volatility of 1.80% compared to Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF (JUCY) at 0.68%. This indicates that DRSK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JUCY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRSKJUCYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.80%

0.68%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.25%

2.26%

+2.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.86%

3.48%

+4.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.45%

3.33%

+4.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.05%

3.33%

+3.72%

DRSK vs. JUCY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRSK has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JUCY's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRSK vs. JUCY - Dividend Comparison

DRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than JUCY's 8.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DRSK
Aptus Defined Risk ETF
3.74%3.67%3.31%3.57%1.93%2.64%5.69%3.04%2.62%
JUCY
Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF
8.17%7.98%7.83%9.31%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRSK and JUCY have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRSK has higher volatility (1.80%) compared to JUCY (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRSK dropped -19.87% vs JUCY's -1.56%.

On 3-year performance, DRSK leads with 7.99% vs 4.70% for JUCY. On fees, JUCY is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, JUCY has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DRSK has performed better with a 7.99% return vs 4.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JUCY is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DRSK.

JUCY has the higher dividend yield at 8.17%, compared with 3.74% for DRSK.

DRSK is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while JUCY is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DRSK and 0.60% for JUCY.

JUCY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRSK and JUCY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer