DRSK vs. DWAT
DRSK (Aptus Defined Risk ETF) and DWAT (Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRSK is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors, while DWAT is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Arrow Funds. Both are actively managed. DRSK charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for DWAT.
Performance
DRSK vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DRSK
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- 8.04%
- 3Y*
- 9.30%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- —
DWAT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRSK vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DRSK Aptus Defined Risk ETF | 5.40% |
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF | 0.00% |
DRSK vs. DWAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRSK
DWAT
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
DRSK
DWAT
Financial Services
DRSK
DWAT
Communication Services
DRSK
DWAT
Consumer Cyclical
DRSK
DWAT
Healthcare
DRSK
DWAT
Industrials
DRSK
DWAT
Consumer Defensive
DRSK
DWAT
Energy
DRSK
DWAT
Utilities
DRSK
DWAT
Real Estate
DRSK
DWAT
Basic Materials
DRSK
DWAT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRSK vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank
DRSK
DWAT
DRSK vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRSK | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.89 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRSK | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | — | — |
Drawdowns
DRSK vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRSK drawdown since its inception was -19.87%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRSK and DWAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRSK | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.87% | 0.00% | -19.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | 0.00% | -0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.21% | 0.00% | -4.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | — | — |
Volatility
DRSK vs. DWAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRSK | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.19% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.26% | 0.00% | +8.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.39% | 0.00% | +7.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.06% | 0.00% | +7.06% |
DRSK vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRSK has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRSK vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison
DRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, while DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRSK Aptus Defined Risk ETF | 3.61% | 3.67% | 3.31% | 3.57% | 1.93% | 2.64% | 5.69% | 3.04% | 2.62% |
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, DRSK is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRSK is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.83% for DWAT.
DRSK has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 0.00% for DWAT.
DRSK is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DWAT is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and Arrow Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DRSK and 1.83% for DWAT.
Find the right allocation for DRSK and DWAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer