PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRSK vs. DWAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRSK vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DRSK

1D
0.34%
1M
2.76%
YTD
4.10%
6M
2.54%
1Y
8.04%
3Y*
9.30%
5Y*
3.13%
10Y*

DWAT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRSK vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


DRSK vs. DWAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DRSK
DWAT

Technology

35.6%
10.2%

Financial Services

11.8%
27.2%

Communication Services

11.2%
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
5.2%

Healthcare

8.5%
5.3%

Industrials

8.3%
25.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
6.5%

Energy

3.5%
4.2%

Utilities

2.4%
5.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
5.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.6%

Technology

DRSK
35.6%
DWAT
10.2%

Financial Services

DRSK
11.8%
DWAT
27.2%

Communication Services

DRSK
11.2%
DWAT
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DRSK
10.1%
DWAT
5.2%

Healthcare

DRSK
8.5%
DWAT
5.3%

Industrials

DRSK
8.3%
DWAT
25.1%

Consumer Defensive

DRSK
4.9%
DWAT
6.5%

Energy

DRSK
3.5%
DWAT
4.2%

Utilities

DRSK
2.4%
DWAT
5.3%

Real Estate

DRSK
1.9%
DWAT
5.1%

Basic Materials

DRSK
1.8%
DWAT
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRSK vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRSK
DRSK Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
DRSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRSK Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
DRSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRSK Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

DWAT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRSK vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRSKDWATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.89

DRSK vs. DWAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRSKDWATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

Drawdowns

DRSK vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRSK drawdown since its inception was -19.87%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRSK and DWAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRSKDWATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.87%

0.00%

-19.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

0.00%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

0.00%

-4.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

Volatility

DRSK vs. DWAT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRSKDWATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.26%

0.00%

+8.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.39%

0.00%

+7.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.06%

0.00%

+7.06%

DRSK vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRSK has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRSK vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison

DRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, while DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DRSK
Aptus Defined Risk ETF
3.61%3.67%3.31%3.57%1.93%2.64%5.69%3.04%2.62%
DWAT
Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, DRSK is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRSK is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.83% for DWAT.

DRSK has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 0.00% for DWAT.

DRSK is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DWAT is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and Arrow Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DRSK and 1.83% for DWAT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRSK and DWAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer