PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRN vs. NVDU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DRN vs. NVDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares (DRN) and Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DRN vs. NVDU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DRN
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares
2.36%-11.24%-5.29%30.97%
NVDU
Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF
-16.24%33.65%289.29%9.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRN achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly higher than NVDU's -16.24% return.


DRN

1D
0.93%
1M
-18.42%
YTD
2.36%
6M
-10.39%
1Y
-14.15%
3Y*
-0.74%
5Y*
-9.58%
10Y*
-6.42%

NVDU

1D
1.74%
1M
-9.05%
YTD
-16.24%
6M
-21.93%
1Y
92.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DRN vs. NVDU - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRN has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDU's 1.04% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DRN vs. NVDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRN
DRN Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
DRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRN Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
DRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRN Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDU
NVDU Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
NVDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDU Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDU Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRN vs. NVDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares (DRN) and Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRNNVDUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.29

1.14

-1.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.10

1.90

-2.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.24

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

2.32

-2.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.13

5.54

-6.67

DRN vs. NVDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRN Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the NVDU Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRN and NVDU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRNNVDUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

1.14

-1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.93

-0.74

Correlation

The correlation between DRN and NVDU is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

DRN vs. NVDU - Dividend Comparison

DRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than NVDU's 6.92% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRN
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares
2.60%2.81%2.24%2.84%2.70%4.21%1.90%2.59%3.11%0.91%
NVDU
Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF
6.92%5.68%16.85%0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

DRN vs. NVDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRN drawdown since its inception was -86.32%, which is greater than NVDU's maximum drawdown of -67.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRN and NVDU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DRNNVDUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.32%

-67.27%

-19.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.57%

-42.27%

+9.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.82%

-34.90%

-35.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.77%

-19.07%

-15.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.25%

17.68%

-5.43%

Volatility

DRN vs. NVDU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares (DRN) is 13.99%, while Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) has a volatility of 20.47%. This indicates that DRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DRNNVDUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.99%

20.47%

-6.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.59%

51.19%

-22.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.51%

81.98%

-33.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.62%

91.99%

-35.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.61%

91.99%

-31.38%