PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRN vs. FREL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRN vs. FREL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares (DRN) and Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRN achieves a 19.36% return, which is significantly higher than FREL's 7.74% return. Over the past 10 years, DRN has underperformed FREL with an annualized return of -5.10%, while FREL has yielded a comparatively higher 5.69% annualized return.


DRN

1D
1.30%
1M
-6.56%
YTD
19.36%
6M
16.51%
1Y
6.60%
3Y*
7.32%
5Y*
-11.56%
10Y*
-5.10%

FREL

1D
0.42%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
7.74%
6M
6.90%
1Y
9.68%
3Y*
9.10%
5Y*
2.11%
10Y*
5.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRN vs. FREL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRN
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares
19.36%-11.24%-5.29%12.03%-67.26%152.94%-55.37%81.86%-25.11%7.50%
FREL
Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF
7.74%3.09%5.05%11.74%-26.21%40.46%-4.99%28.78%-4.52%8.86%

Correlation

The correlation between DRN and FREL is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2015

0.98

The correlation between DRN and FREL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

DRN vs. FREL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DRN
FREL

Real Estate

19.6%
97.6%

Basic Materials

0.4%
1.2%

Communication Services

-

0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.1%

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

0.3%

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

DRN
19.6%
FREL
97.6%

Basic Materials

DRN
0.4%
FREL
1.2%

Communication Services

DRN

-

FREL
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DRN

-

FREL

-

Consumer Defensive

DRN

-

FREL

-

Energy

DRN

-

FREL
0.1%

Financial Services

DRN

-

FREL
0.0%

Healthcare

DRN

-

FREL

-

Industrials

DRN

-

FREL

-

Technology

DRN

-

FREL
0.3%

Utilities

DRN

-

FREL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRN vs. FREL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRN
DRN Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
DRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRN Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
DRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRN Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

FREL
FREL Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FREL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FREL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FREL Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FREL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FREL Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRN vs. FREL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares (DRN) and Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRNFRELDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.17

0.74

-0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.50

1.08

-0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.14

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

1.16

-0.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.65

3.68

-3.03

DRN vs. FREL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRN Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the FREL Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRN and FREL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRNFRELDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

0.74

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

0.11

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

0.28

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.26

-0.05

Drawdowns

DRN vs. FREL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRN drawdown since its inception was -86.32%, which is greater than FREL's maximum drawdown of -42.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRN and FREL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRNFRELDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.32%

-42.61%

-43.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.28%

-8.45%

-15.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.26%

-17.54%

-30.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.58%

-34.40%

-46.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.32%

-42.61%

-43.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.97%

-3.80%

-62.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.06%

-9.95%

-25.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.89%

2.67%

+8.22%

Volatility

DRN vs. FREL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares (DRN) has a higher volatility of 11.21% compared to Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) at 3.80%. This indicates that DRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FREL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRNFRELDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.21%

3.80%

+7.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.18%

9.35%

+19.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.04%

13.17%

+26.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.66%

18.85%

+37.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.62%

20.68%

+39.94%

DRN vs. FREL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRN has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FREL's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRN vs. FREL - Dividend Comparison

DRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than FREL's 3.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRN
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares
2.23%2.81%2.24%2.84%2.70%4.21%1.90%2.59%3.11%0.91%0.00%0.00%
FREL
Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF
3.34%3.59%3.48%3.73%3.57%2.34%3.77%3.32%5.54%3.27%4.01%3.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, DRN and FREL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DRN has higher volatility (11.21%) compared to FREL (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRN dropped -86.32% vs FREL's -42.61%.

On 10-year performance, FREL leads with 5.69% vs -5.10% for DRN. On fees, FREL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FREL has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FREL has performed better with a 5.69% return vs -5.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FREL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DRN.

FREL has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 2.23% for DRN.

DRN tracks MSCI US REIT Index (300%), while FREL tracks MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DRN and 0.08% for FREL.

FREL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRN and FREL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer