PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRN vs. BBRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRN vs. BBRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares (DRN) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRN achieves a 29.86% return, which is significantly higher than BBRE's 18.65% return.


DRN

1D
1.48%
1M
-3.26%
6M
27.76%
YTD
29.86%
1Y
16.43%
3Y*
4.43%
5Y*
-11.67%
10Y*
-6.30%

BBRE

1D
0.68%
1M
1.23%
6M
16.92%
YTD
18.65%
1Y
20.68%
3Y*
11.08%
5Y*
4.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRN vs. BBRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DRN
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares
29.86%-11.24%-5.29%12.03%-67.26%152.94%-55.37%81.86%-14.95%
BBRE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF
18.65%2.09%8.24%13.85%-24.68%42.99%-7.55%26.06%-2.41%

Correlation

The correlation between DRN and BBRE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2018

0.95

The correlation between DRN and BBRE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRN vs. BBRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRN
DRN Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
DRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRN Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
DRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRN Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

BBRE
BBRE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BBRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBRE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BBRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBRE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRN vs. BBRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares (DRN) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRNBBREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.25

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

2.57

-1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.51

8.16

-6.65

DRN vs. BBRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRN Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the BBRE Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRN and BBRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRN vs. BBRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRN drawdown since its inception was -86.32%, which is greater than BBRE's maximum drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRN and BBRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRNBBREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.32%

-43.61%

-42.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.28%

-8.07%

-16.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.26%

-18.92%

-29.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.58%

-31.15%

-49.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.98%

-0.73%

-62.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.23%

-10.40%

-24.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.91%

2.54%

+8.37%

Volatility

DRN vs. BBRE - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares (DRN) has a higher volatility of 15.53% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE) at 4.82%. This indicates that DRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRNBBREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.53%

4.82%

+10.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.02%

10.67%

+22.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.58%

14.09%

+28.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.94%

18.83%

+38.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.77%

22.50%

+38.27%

DRN vs. BBRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRN has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BBRE's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRN vs. BBRE - Dividend Comparison

DRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than BBRE's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBRE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF
2.61%3.24%3.19%3.68%2.62%1.70%3.17%2.19%1.96%0.00%
DRN
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares
1.90%2.81%2.24%2.84%2.70%4.21%1.90%2.59%3.11%0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, DRN and BBRE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DRN has higher volatility (15.53%) compared to BBRE (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRN dropped -86.32% vs BBRE's -43.61%.

On 5-year performance, BBRE leads with 4.93% vs -11.67% for DRN. On fees, BBRE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, BBRE has been the lower-risk option at 4.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBRE has performed better with a 4.93% return vs -11.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBRE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DRN.

BBRE has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.90% for DRN.

DRN tracks MSCI US REIT Index (300%), while BBRE tracks MSCI US REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DRN and 0.11% for BBRE.

BBRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRN and BBRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer