PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRMCX vs. SSMHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRMCX vs. SSMHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Mid-Cap Growth Fund (DRMCX) and State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRMCX achieves a 15.08% return, which is significantly higher than SSMHX's 14.18% return. Over the past 10 years, DRMCX has outperformed SSMHX with an annualized return of 14.99%, while SSMHX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.94% annualized return.


DRMCX

1D
0.59%
1M
8.02%
YTD
15.08%
6M
12.70%
1Y
23.31%
3Y*
23.04%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
14.99%

SSMHX

1D
1.00%
1M
5.71%
YTD
14.18%
6M
13.12%
1Y
29.97%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
6.39%
10Y*
11.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRMCX vs. SSMHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRMCX
Virtus Mid-Cap Growth Fund
15.08%18.09%20.49%24.81%-32.59%14.91%55.27%41.73%-11.16%25.08%
SSMHX
State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio
14.18%12.90%10.73%25.21%-25.43%13.08%32.46%28.00%-9.21%18.26%

Correlation

The correlation between DRMCX and SSMHX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2015

0.91

The correlation between DRMCX and SSMHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRMCX vs. SSMHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRMCX
DRMCX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
DRMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
DRMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

SSMHX
SSMHX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SSMHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSMHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSMHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SSMHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSMHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRMCX vs. SSMHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Mid-Cap Growth Fund (DRMCX) and State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRMCXSSMHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.32

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

3.18

-1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.39

11.56

-5.17

DRMCX vs. SSMHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRMCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the SSMHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRMCX and SSMHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRMCXSSMHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

1.89

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.29

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.54

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.48

-0.16

Drawdowns

DRMCX vs. SSMHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRMCX drawdown since its inception was -67.97%, which is greater than SSMHX's maximum drawdown of -41.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRMCX and SSMHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRMCXSSMHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.97%

-41.61%

-26.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.75%

-10.03%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.83%

-30.38%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.47%

-34.84%

-8.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.47%

-41.61%

-1.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.10%

-9.15%

-12.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.90%

2.76%

+1.14%

Volatility

DRMCX vs. SSMHX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Mid-Cap Growth Fund (DRMCX) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX) at 4.70%. This indicates that DRMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSMHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRMCXSSMHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

4.70%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.97%

12.36%

+2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.99%

16.90%

+2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.04%

22.41%

+1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.60%

22.39%

+1.21%

DRMCX vs. SSMHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRMCX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than SSMHX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRMCX vs. SSMHX - Dividend Comparison

DRMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.37%, more than SSMHX's 6.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRMCX
Virtus Mid-Cap Growth Fund
14.37%16.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%27.44%9.02%4.12%14.34%8.78%7.35%5.65%
SSMHX
State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio
6.24%7.12%0.00%1.56%2.31%16.30%2.91%3.65%6.43%4.01%1.71%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, DRMCX and SSMHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DRMCX has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to SSMHX (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRMCX dropped -67.97% vs SSMHX's -41.61%.

SSMHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRMCX and SSMHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer