PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRMCX vs. AOTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRMCX vs. AOTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Mid-Cap Growth Fund (DRMCX) and Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (AOTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRMCX achieves a 15.08% return, which is significantly lower than AOTIX's 33.86% return. Over the past 10 years, DRMCX has outperformed AOTIX with an annualized return of 14.99%, while AOTIX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.00% annualized return.


DRMCX

1D
0.59%
1M
8.02%
YTD
15.08%
6M
12.70%
1Y
23.31%
3Y*
23.04%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
14.99%

AOTIX

1D
1.28%
1M
12.58%
YTD
33.86%
6M
38.86%
1Y
65.63%
3Y*
25.63%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*
11.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRMCX vs. AOTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRMCX
Virtus Mid-Cap Growth Fund
15.08%18.09%20.49%24.81%-32.59%14.91%55.27%41.73%-11.16%25.08%
AOTIX
Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
33.86%29.73%5.44%17.83%-22.10%-0.26%20.78%17.66%-16.62%38.37%

Correlation

The correlation between DRMCX and AOTIX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2004

0.63

The correlation between DRMCX and AOTIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRMCX vs. AOTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRMCX
DRMCX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
DRMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
DRMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

AOTIX
AOTIX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
AOTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AOTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRMCX vs. AOTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Mid-Cap Growth Fund (DRMCX) and Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (AOTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRMCXAOTIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.70

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

4.83

-3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.39

18.89

-12.51

DRMCX vs. AOTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRMCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the AOTIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRMCX and AOTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRMCXAOTIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

3.80

-2.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.51

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.63

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.46

-0.14

Drawdowns

DRMCX vs. AOTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRMCX drawdown since its inception was -67.97%, roughly equal to the maximum AOTIX drawdown of -68.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRMCX and AOTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRMCXAOTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.97%

-68.42%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.75%

-13.70%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.83%

-17.76%

-9.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.47%

-36.18%

-7.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.47%

-38.05%

-5.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.10%

-18.66%

-3.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.90%

3.50%

+0.40%

Volatility

DRMCX vs. AOTIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Mid-Cap Growth Fund (DRMCX) is 5.07%, while Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (AOTIX) has a volatility of 7.08%. This indicates that DRMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRMCXAOTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

7.08%

-2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.97%

14.77%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.99%

17.44%

+1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.04%

16.30%

+7.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.60%

17.40%

+6.20%

DRMCX vs. AOTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRMCX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than AOTIX's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRMCX vs. AOTIX - Dividend Comparison

DRMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.37%, more than AOTIX's 2.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOTIX
Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
2.48%3.33%6.13%3.48%3.15%1.94%1.40%2.37%2.81%1.60%1.91%1.10%
DRMCX
Virtus Mid-Cap Growth Fund
14.37%16.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%27.44%9.02%4.12%14.34%8.78%7.35%5.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRMCX and AOTIX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AOTIX has higher volatility (7.08%) compared to DRMCX (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRMCX dropped -67.97% vs AOTIX's -68.42%.

AOTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.80 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRMCX and AOTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer