DRLL vs. BESF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DRLL (Strive U.S. Energy ETF) and BESF (Bastion Energy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. DRLL is passively managed, while BESF is actively managed. Over the past year, DRLL returned 26.18% vs 61.61% for BESF. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRLL charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BESF.

Performance

DRLL vs. BESF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRLL achieves a 21.39% return, which is significantly higher than BESF's 16.12% return.

DRLL

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -7.79%
• YTD: 21.39%
• 6M: 21.91%
• 1Y: 26.18%
• 3Y*: 12.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BESF

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: -6.28%
• YTD: 16.12%
• 6M: 15.17%
• 1Y: 61.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRLL vs. BESF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF	21.39%	9.01%
BESF Bastion Energy ETF	16.12%	38.76%

Correlation

The correlation between DRLL and BESF is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025	0.59

The correlation between DRLL and BESF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DRLL vs. BESF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRLL

DRLL Risk / Return Rank: 33
DRLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
DRLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
DRLL Omega Ratio Rank: 30
DRLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
DRLL Martin Ratio Rank: 34

BESF

BESF Risk / Return Rank: 84
BESF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
BESF Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
BESF Omega Ratio Rank: 77
BESF Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
BESF Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRLL vs. BESF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DRLL	BESF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.16	2.52	-1.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	3.34	-1.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.41	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.58	5.64	-4.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.66	15.57	-10.91

DRLL vs. BESF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRLL Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the BESF Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRLL and BESF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DRLL vs. BESF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRLL drawdown since its inception was -23.73%, which is greater than BESF's maximum drawdown of -10.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRLL and BESF.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRLL	BESF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.73%	-10.97%	-12.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.66%	-10.97%	-5.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.01%	-8.73%	-6.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.07%	-2.74%	-5.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.64%	3.97%	+1.67%

Volatility

DRLL vs. BESF - Volatility Comparison

Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to Bastion Energy ETF (BESF) at 6.97%. This indicates that DRLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BESF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DRLL	BESF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.92%	6.97%	+0.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.45%	14.93%	+3.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.78%	24.75%	-1.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.82%	24.39%	-0.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.82%	24.39%	-0.57%

DRLL vs. BESF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRLL has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than BESF's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRLL vs. BESF - Dividend Comparison

DRLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than BESF's 5.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BESF Bastion Energy ETF	5.86%	6.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF	2.52%	2.99%	3.00%	3.01%	1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRLL and BESF in my portfolio?

DRLL and BESF have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DRLL or BESF?

DRLL has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to BESF (6.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRLL dropped -23.73% vs BESF's -10.97%.

Which ETF is better, DRLL or BESF?

On 1-year performance, BESF leads with 61.61% vs 26.18% for DRLL. On fees, DRLL is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, BESF has been the lower-risk option at 6.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DRLL or BESF?

Over the 1-year period, BESF has performed better with a 61.61% return vs 26.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRLL or BESF?

DRLL is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BESF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRLL or BESF?

BESF has the higher dividend yield at 5.86%, compared with 2.52% for DRLL.

What is the main difference between DRLL and BESF?

They also come from different issuers: Strive and Bastion. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DRLL and 0.80% for BESF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BESF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.