PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRLIX vs. SOAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRLIX vs. SOAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund (DRLIX) and Spirit of America Real Estate Income & Growth Fund (SOAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRLIX achieves a 8.10% return, which is significantly lower than SOAAX's 11.76% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: DRLIX at 5.14% and SOAAX at 5.14%.


DRLIX

1D
0.22%
1M
-1.71%
YTD
8.10%
6M
7.90%
1Y
12.10%
3Y*
10.02%
5Y*
2.40%
10Y*
5.14%

SOAAX

1D
0.34%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
11.76%
6M
10.35%
1Y
11.63%
3Y*
8.63%
5Y*
2.84%
10Y*
5.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRLIX vs. SOAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRLIX
BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund
8.10%9.12%3.21%11.35%-23.24%26.95%-2.30%23.05%-4.57%11.24%
SOAAX
Spirit of America Real Estate Income & Growth Fund
11.76%-0.90%7.57%9.60%-28.40%42.01%-5.06%28.09%-6.82%6.80%

Correlation

The correlation between DRLIX and SOAAX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007

0.88

The correlation between DRLIX and SOAAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRLIX vs. SOAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRLIX
DRLIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
DRLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
DRLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

SOAAX
SOAAX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
SOAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
SOAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRLIX vs. SOAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund (DRLIX) and Spirit of America Real Estate Income & Growth Fund (SOAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRLIXSOAAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.01

0.87

+0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.44

1.24

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.16

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

1.44

-0.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.33

4.32

+0.01

DRLIX vs. SOAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRLIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the SOAAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRLIX and SOAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRLIXSOAAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

0.87

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.16

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.26

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.26

-0.09

Drawdowns

DRLIX vs. SOAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRLIX drawdown since its inception was -68.86%, smaller than the maximum SOAAX drawdown of -78.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRLIX and SOAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRLIXSOAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.86%

-78.19%

+9.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.13%

-7.74%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.55%

-19.29%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.86%

-36.03%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.82%

-41.24%

-0.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.56%

-6.51%

+2.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.35%

-14.62%

+0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

2.58%

+0.13%

Volatility

DRLIX vs. SOAAX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund (DRLIX) and Spirit of America Real Estate Income & Growth Fund (SOAAX) have volatilities of 3.70% and 3.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRLIXSOAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

3.68%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.99%

9.19%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.61%

12.80%

-1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.39%

18.24%

-1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.63%

19.72%

-2.09%

DRLIX vs. SOAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRLIX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SOAAX's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRLIX vs. SOAAX - Dividend Comparison

DRLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than SOAAX's 9.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRLIX
BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund
2.87%3.11%2.08%1.70%7.68%8.25%1.47%11.17%4.63%4.72%5.73%5.40%
SOAAX
Spirit of America Real Estate Income & Growth Fund
9.52%10.64%9.53%9.32%9.32%6.12%8.13%7.11%8.47%6.87%7.18%8.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DRLIX and SOAAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DRLIX has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to SOAAX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRLIX dropped -68.86% vs SOAAX's -78.19%.

DRLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRLIX and SOAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer