PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRLIX vs. FRIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRLIX vs. FRIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund (DRLIX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class I (FRIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRLIX achieves a 8.10% return, which is significantly higher than FRIRX's 3.56% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DRLIX having a 5.14% annualized return and FRIRX not far ahead at 5.32%.


DRLIX

1D
0.22%
1M
-1.71%
YTD
8.10%
6M
7.90%
1Y
12.10%
3Y*
10.02%
5Y*
2.40%
10Y*
5.14%

FRIRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.24%
YTD
3.56%
6M
3.93%
1Y
8.17%
3Y*
8.42%
5Y*
3.63%
10Y*
5.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRLIX vs. FRIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRLIX
BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund
8.10%9.12%3.21%11.35%-23.24%26.95%-2.30%23.05%-4.57%11.24%
FRIRX
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class I
3.56%7.10%7.89%9.36%-14.59%18.98%-1.08%17.89%-1.81%6.23%

Correlation

The correlation between DRLIX and FRIRX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2010

0.86

The correlation between DRLIX and FRIRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRLIX vs. FRIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRLIX
DRLIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
DRLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
DRLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

FRIRX
FRIRX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FRIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FRIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRLIX vs. FRIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund (DRLIX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class I (FRIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRLIXFRIRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.39

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

2.39

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.33

10.42

-6.10

DRLIX vs. FRIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRLIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the FRIRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRLIX and FRIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRLIXFRIRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

2.03

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.56

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.56

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.81

-0.63

Drawdowns

DRLIX vs. FRIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRLIX drawdown since its inception was -68.86%, which is greater than FRIRX's maximum drawdown of -34.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRLIX and FRIRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRLIXFRIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.86%

-34.50%

-34.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.13%

-3.43%

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.55%

-7.28%

-10.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.86%

-18.18%

-13.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.82%

-34.50%

-7.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.56%

-0.48%

-3.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.35%

-3.27%

-11.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

0.79%

+1.92%

Volatility

DRLIX vs. FRIRX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund (DRLIX) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class I (FRIRX) at 1.28%. This indicates that DRLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRLIXFRIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

1.28%

+2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.99%

3.14%

+5.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.61%

4.05%

+7.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.39%

6.50%

+9.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.63%

9.50%

+8.13%

DRLIX vs. FRIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRLIX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FRIRX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRLIX vs. FRIRX - Dividend Comparison

DRLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than FRIRX's 4.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRLIX
BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund
2.87%3.11%2.08%1.70%7.68%8.25%1.47%11.17%4.63%4.72%5.73%5.40%
FRIRX
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class I
4.49%4.62%4.68%5.01%6.08%1.48%4.80%5.70%5.10%4.43%5.05%3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRLIX and FRIRX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRLIX has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to FRIRX (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRLIX dropped -68.86% vs FRIRX's -34.50%.

FRIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRLIX and FRIRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer