DRLIX vs. FRINX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund (DRLIX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX).
DRLIX is managed by Dreyfus. It was launched on Dec 28, 2006. FRINX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 14, 2010.
Performance
DRLIX vs. FRINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DRLIX vs. FRINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRLIX BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund | 0.47% | 9.12% | 3.21% | 11.35% | -23.24% | 26.95% | -2.30% | 23.05% | -4.57% | 11.24% |
FRINX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A | -0.08% | 6.87% | 7.61% | 9.01% | -14.79% | 18.64% | -1.36% | 17.52% | -1.93% | 6.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRLIX achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly higher than FRINX's -0.08% return. Over the past 10 years, DRLIX has underperformed FRINX with an annualized return of 4.55%, while FRINX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.00% annualized return.
DRLIX
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -9.70%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- 1Y
- 8.28%
- 3Y*
- 7.57%
- 5Y*
- 3.06%
- 10Y*
- 4.55%
FRINX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -3.12%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- 7.09%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- 5.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DRLIX vs. FRINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRLIX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FRINX's 0.98% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DRLIX vs. FRINX — Risk / Return Rank
DRLIX
FRINX
DRLIX vs. FRINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund (DRLIX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRLIX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | 0.86 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.92 | 1.16 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.17 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 1.03 | -0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.04 | 4.35 | -1.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRLIX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 0.86 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.56 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.53 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.75 | -0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between DRLIX and FRINX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DRLIX vs. FRINX - Dividend Comparison
DRLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, less than FRINX's 4.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRLIX BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund | 3.09% | 3.11% | 2.08% | 1.70% | 7.68% | 8.25% | 1.47% | 11.17% | 4.63% | 4.72% | 5.73% | 5.40% |
FRINX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A | 4.40% | 4.40% | 4.41% | 4.78% | 5.80% | 1.31% | 4.53% | 5.45% | 4.89% | 4.21% | 4.77% | 3.53% |
Drawdowns
DRLIX vs. FRINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRLIX drawdown since its inception was -68.86%, which is greater than FRINX's maximum drawdown of -34.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRLIX and FRINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRLIX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.86% | -34.50% | -34.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.46% | -4.28% | -6.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.86% | -18.30% | -13.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.82% | -34.50% | -7.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.70% | -3.12% | -6.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.46% | -3.41% | -11.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 1.01% | +1.71% |
Volatility
DRLIX vs. FRINX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund (DRLIX) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX) at 1.55%. This indicates that DRLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DRLIX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.27% | 1.55% | +2.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.00% | 2.84% | +5.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.79% | 4.92% | +8.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 6.51% | +9.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.60% | 9.50% | +8.10% |