PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRIPX vs. SMVLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRIPX vs. SMVLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The MP 63 Fund (DRIPX) and Smead Value Fund (SMVLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRIPX achieves a 12.03% return, which is significantly lower than SMVLX's 14.42% return. Over the past 10 years, DRIPX has underperformed SMVLX with an annualized return of 10.13%, while SMVLX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.71% annualized return.


DRIPX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.99%
YTD
12.03%
6M
11.05%
1Y
23.60%
3Y*
12.45%
5Y*
7.31%
10Y*
10.13%

SMVLX

1D
0.62%
1M
0.05%
YTD
14.42%
6M
13.80%
1Y
27.75%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
12.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRIPX vs. SMVLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRIPX
The MP 63 Fund
12.03%13.89%4.75%5.93%-8.37%20.46%8.13%28.65%-5.55%18.19%
SMVLX
Smead Value Fund
14.42%5.05%4.78%16.87%-2.79%42.46%1.71%26.29%-4.79%19.73%

Correlation

The correlation between DRIPX and SMVLX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009

0.86

The correlation between DRIPX and SMVLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRIPX vs. SMVLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRIPX
DRIPX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DRIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

SMVLX
SMVLX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SMVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SMVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRIPX vs. SMVLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The MP 63 Fund (DRIPX) and Smead Value Fund (SMVLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRIPXSMVLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.33

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

4.58

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.65

13.18

-0.54

DRIPX vs. SMVLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRIPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the SMVLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRIPX and SMVLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRIPX vs. SMVLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRIPX drawdown since its inception was -53.54%, which is greater than SMVLX's maximum drawdown of -39.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIPX and SMVLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRIPXSMVLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.54%

-39.56%

-13.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.70%

-5.90%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.58%

-24.62%

+5.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.97%

-24.62%

+4.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.20%

-39.56%

+4.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-2.62%

+2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

-4.58%

-1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

2.05%

-0.09%

Volatility

DRIPX vs. SMVLX - Volatility Comparison

The MP 63 Fund (DRIPX) and Smead Value Fund (SMVLX) have volatilities of 3.52% and 3.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRIPXSMVLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

3.58%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

8.78%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.81%

14.28%

-3.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.20%

18.37%

-4.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.46%

19.49%

-3.03%

DRIPX vs. SMVLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRIPX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than SMVLX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRIPX vs. SMVLX - Dividend Comparison

DRIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.28%, more than SMVLX's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRIPX
The MP 63 Fund
6.28%7.04%0.00%3.13%4.27%3.55%3.48%3.46%6.25%1.68%4.27%6.80%
SMVLX
Smead Value Fund
1.46%1.67%1.08%1.34%1.78%3.91%1.40%3.83%7.47%0.22%3.14%3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRIPX and SMVLX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMVLX has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to DRIPX (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIPX dropped -53.54% vs SMVLX's -39.56%.

DRIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRIPX and SMVLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer