PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRIOX vs. ARHBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRIOX vs. ARHBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Driehaus International Small Cap Growth Fund (DRIOX) and Artisan International Explorer Fund (ARHBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRIOX achieves a 5.51% return, which is significantly lower than ARHBX's 24.77% return.


DRIOX

1D
2.99%
1M
-3.36%
6M
0.92%
YTD
5.51%
1Y
11.23%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
3.24%
10Y*
9.30%
ALL TIME*
7.50%

ARHBX

1D
1.31%
1M
3.70%
6M
18.67%
YTD
24.77%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
19.00%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DRIOX vs. ARHBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DRIOX
Driehaus International Small Cap Growth Fund
5.51%28.93%3.15%11.96%0.42%
ARHBX
Artisan International Explorer Fund
24.77%18.32%8.34%20.65%-2.64%

Correlation

The correlation between DRIOX and ARHBX is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2022

0.77

The correlation between DRIOX and ARHBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRIOX vs. ARHBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DRIOX
DRIOX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
DRIOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

ARHBX
ARHBX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ARHBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARHBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARHBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ARHBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARHBX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DRIOX vs. ARHBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Driehaus International Small Cap Growth Fund (DRIOX) and Artisan International Explorer Fund (ARHBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRIOXARHBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.30

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

2.91

-2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.52

7.83

-5.31

DRIOX vs. ARHBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRIOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the ARHBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRIOX and ARHBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRIOX vs. ARHBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRIOX drawdown since its inception was -59.68%, which is greater than ARHBX's maximum drawdown of -18.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIOX and ARHBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRIOXARHBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.68%

-18.10%

-41.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.47%

-9.51%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.23%

-11.79%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.44%

-0.85%

-6.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.21%

-3.53%

-11.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.48%

3.53%

+0.95%

Volatility

DRIOX vs. ARHBX - Volatility Comparison

Driehaus International Small Cap Growth Fund (DRIOX) has a higher volatility of 6.45% compared to Artisan International Explorer Fund (ARHBX) at 5.24%. This indicates that DRIOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARHBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRIOXARHBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.45%

5.24%

+1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.64%

15.14%

+1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.01%

16.85%

+2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.16%

14.77%

+9.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.92%

14.77%

+6.15%

DRIOX vs. ARHBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRIOX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is lower than ARHBX's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRIOX vs. ARHBX - Dividend Comparison

DRIOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than ARHBX's 5.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARHBX
Artisan International Explorer Fund
5.96%7.44%4.86%1.97%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DRIOX
Driehaus International Small Cap Growth Fund
1.01%1.06%0.51%1.16%5.94%27.01%8.26%0.77%16.19%15.63%0.00%2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRIOX and ARHBX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRIOX has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to ARHBX (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIOX dropped -59.68% vs ARHBX's -18.10%.

ARHBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRIOX and ARHBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer