PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRIIX vs. URTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRIIX vs. URTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional 2045 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIIX) and USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRIIX achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly higher than URTRX's 7.71% return. Over the past 10 years, DRIIX has outperformed URTRX with an annualized return of 11.72%, while URTRX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.96% annualized return.


DRIIX

1D
-0.56%
1M
2.78%
YTD
9.44%
6M
9.94%
1Y
22.73%
3Y*
17.61%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
11.72%

URTRX

1D
-0.42%
1M
2.22%
YTD
7.71%
6M
8.17%
1Y
17.25%
3Y*
12.99%
5Y*
6.38%
10Y*
7.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRIIX vs. URTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRIIX
Dimensional 2045 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
9.44%17.17%15.44%19.21%-14.15%20.45%13.36%25.42%-9.17%21.64%
URTRX
USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund
7.71%14.78%8.09%13.98%-13.23%12.23%9.25%17.13%-6.98%16.14%

Correlation

The correlation between DRIIX and URTRX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.95

The correlation between DRIIX and URTRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRIIX vs. URTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRIIX
DRIIX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DRIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

URTRX
URTRX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
URTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
URTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
URTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
URTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRIIX vs. URTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional 2045 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIIX) and USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRIIXURTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.46

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

3.33

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.69

14.39

+0.30

DRIIX vs. URTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRIIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the URTRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRIIX and URTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRIIXURTRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

2.46

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.66

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.77

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.61

+0.20

Drawdowns

DRIIX vs. URTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRIIX drawdown since its inception was -32.56%, roughly equal to the maximum URTRX drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIIX and URTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRIIXURTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.56%

-34.10%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-5.29%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.04%

-9.12%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.77%

-19.52%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.56%

-23.56%

-9.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-0.42%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-4.15%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

1.22%

+0.35%

Volatility

DRIIX vs. URTRX - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional 2045 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIIX) has a higher volatility of 2.71% compared to USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX) at 2.54%. This indicates that DRIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRIIXURTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

2.54%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.19%

5.82%

+1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.98%

7.16%

+1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.86%

9.69%

+3.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.62%

10.35%

+4.27%

DRIIX vs. URTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRIIX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than URTRX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DRIIX vs. URTRX - Dividend Comparison

DRIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than URTRX's 6.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRIIX
Dimensional 2045 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
2.68%2.89%3.25%3.43%3.90%3.23%2.92%2.19%2.29%1.23%1.39%0.00%
URTRX
USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund
6.29%6.78%3.16%4.24%9.53%7.66%4.53%11.43%8.54%8.10%4.06%2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, DRIIX and URTRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DRIIX has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to URTRX (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIIX dropped -32.56% vs URTRX's -34.10%.

DRIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRIIX and URTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer