DRIGX vs. FRBHX
DRIGX (Dimensional 2035 Target Date Retirement Income Fund) and FRBHX (Fidelity Freedom® 2070 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past year, DRIGX returned 16.15% vs 30.74% for FRBHX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DRIGX charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FRBHX.
Performance
DRIGX vs. FRBHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRIGX achieves a 6.44% return, which is significantly lower than FRBHX's 13.77% return.
DRIGX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 6.44%
- 6M
- 6.40%
- 1Y
- 16.15%
- 3Y*
- 10.60%
- 5Y*
- 4.02%
- 10Y*
- 7.68%
FRBHX
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 13.77%
- 6M
- 15.28%
- 1Y
- 30.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRIGX vs. FRBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DRIGX Dimensional 2035 Target Date Retirement Income Fund | 6.44% | 11.65% | 1.19% |
FRBHX Fidelity Freedom® 2070 Fund Class K6 | 13.77% | 23.65% | 3.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRIGX and FRBHX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2024 | 0.83 |
The correlation between DRIGX and FRBHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRIGX vs. FRBHX — Risk / Return Rank
DRIGX
FRBHX
DRIGX vs. FRBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional 2035 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIGX) and Fidelity Freedom® 2070 Fund Class K6 (FRBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRIGX | FRBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.45 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 3.16 | -0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.87 | 14.08 | -4.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRIGX | FRBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 2.42 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 1.41 | -0.70 |
Drawdowns
DRIGX vs. FRBHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRIGX drawdown since its inception was -26.73%, which is greater than FRBHX's maximum drawdown of -15.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIGX and FRBHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRIGX | FRBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.73% | -15.29% | -11.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.59% | -9.77% | +3.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -0.15% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.25% | -1.78% | -3.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 2.19% | -0.57% |
Volatility
DRIGX vs. FRBHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional 2035 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIGX) is 2.57%, while Fidelity Freedom® 2070 Fund Class K6 (FRBHX) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that DRIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRBHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRIGX | FRBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.57% | 4.18% | -1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.16% | 10.49% | -4.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.93% | 12.79% | -4.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.26% | 15.77% | -4.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.10% | 15.77% | -4.67% |
DRIGX vs. FRBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRIGX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than FRBHX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRIGX vs. FRBHX - Dividend Comparison
DRIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.49%, more than FRBHX's 4.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRIGX Dimensional 2035 Target Date Retirement Income Fund | 6.49% | 6.76% | 4.33% | 3.96% | 5.94% | 3.45% | 3.32% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 1.23% | 1.38% |
FRBHX Fidelity Freedom® 2070 Fund Class K6 | 4.20% | 2.53% | 2.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRIGX and FRBHX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FRBHX has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to DRIGX (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIGX dropped -26.73% vs FRBHX's -15.29%.
FRBHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRIGX and FRBHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer