DRIGX vs. DTDRX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

DRIGX (Dimensional 2035 Target Date Retirement Income Fund) and DTDRX (Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds from Dimensional. Over the past 5 years, DRIGX returned 4.02%/yr vs 11.40%/yr for DTDRX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DRIGX charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for DTDRX.

Performance

DRIGX vs. DTDRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional 2035 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIGX) and Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DTDRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRIGX achieves a 6.44% return, which is significantly lower than DTDRX's 12.04% return.

DRIGX

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 1.23%
• YTD: 6.44%
• 6M: 6.40%
• 1Y: 16.15%
• 3Y*: 10.60%
• 5Y*: 4.02%
• 10Y*: 7.68%

DTDRX

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 2.15%
• YTD: 12.04%
• 6M: 12.44%
• 1Y: 27.85%
• 3Y*: 20.31%
• 5Y*: 11.40%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRIGX vs. DTDRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DRIGX Dimensional 2035 Target Date Retirement Income Fund	6.44%	11.65%	7.31%	12.95%	-20.97%	15.21%	16.43%
DTDRX Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund	12.04%	19.28%	17.13%	21.29%	-15.25%	20.99%	13.15%

Correlation

The correlation between DRIGX and DTDRX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020	0.83

The correlation between DRIGX and DTDRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DRIGX vs. DTDRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRIGX

DRIGX Risk / Return Rank: 49
DRIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
DRIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
DRIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
DRIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
DRIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

DTDRX

DTDRX Risk / Return Rank: 83
DTDRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
DTDRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
DTDRX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
DTDRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
DTDRX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRIGX vs. DTDRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional 2035 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIGX) and Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DTDRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DRIGX	DTDRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	2.77	-0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	3.89	-1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.50	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	3.57	-1.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.87	15.67	-5.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DRIGX vs. DTDRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRIGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the DTDRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRIGX and DTDRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DRIGX	DTDRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.03	2.77	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.78	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.70	+0.01

Drawdowns

DRIGX vs. DTDRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRIGX drawdown since its inception was -26.73%, smaller than the maximum DTDRX drawdown of -33.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIGX and DTDRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRIGX	DTDRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.73%	-33.33%	+6.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.59%	-8.57%	+1.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.99%	-15.95%	+4.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.73%	-23.47%	-3.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-0.31%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.25%	-5.09%	-0.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.62%	1.88%	-0.26%

Volatility

DRIGX vs. DTDRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional 2035 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIGX) is 2.57%, while Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DTDRX) has a volatility of 3.08%. This indicates that DRIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTDRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DRIGX	DTDRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.57%	3.08%	-0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.16%	8.69%	-2.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.93%	11.07%	-3.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.26%	14.87%	-3.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.10%	19.16%	-8.06%

DRIGX vs. DTDRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRIGX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than DTDRX's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DRIGX vs. DTDRX - Dividend Comparison

DRIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.49%, more than DTDRX's 1.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
DRIGX Dimensional 2035 Target Date Retirement Income Fund	6.49%	6.76%	4.33%	3.96%	5.94%	3.45%	3.32%	2.31%	2.46%	1.23%	1.38%
DTDRX Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund	1.38%	1.31%	2.07%	1.94%	2.01%	1.53%	2.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRIGX and DTDRX in my portfolio?

DRIGX and DTDRX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DRIGX or DTDRX?

DTDRX has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to DRIGX (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIGX dropped -26.73% vs DTDRX's -33.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DTDRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.