DRGN.L vs. EMCA.L
DRGN.L (L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF) and EMCA.L (iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. DRGN.L is actively managed, while EMCA.L is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRGN.L returned 2.01%/yr vs 1.91%/yr for EMCA.L. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DRGN.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EMCA.L.
Performance
DRGN.L vs. EMCA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRGN.L achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly higher than EMCA.L's 1.55% return.
DRGN.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- 6M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 6.54%
- 3Y*
- 4.53%
- 5Y*
- 2.01%
- 10Y*
- —
EMCA.L
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 5.99%
- 3Y*
- 6.97%
- 5Y*
- 1.91%
- 10Y*
- —
DRGN.L vs. EMCA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRGN.L L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF | 3.18% | 5.48% | 3.14% | 0.48% | -5.41% | 7.20% | 1.10% |
EMCA.L iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.55% | 8.60% | 6.21% | 7.96% | -12.09% | -0.51% | 1.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRGN.L and EMCA.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRGN.L vs. EMCA.L — Risk / Return Rank
DRGN.L
EMCA.L
DRGN.L vs. EMCA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF (DRGN.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMCA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRGN.L | EMCA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.29 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.37 | 2.63 | +1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.98 | 10.19 | +4.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRGN.L vs. EMCA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRGN.L drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, smaller than the maximum EMCA.L drawdown of -24.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRGN.L and EMCA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRGN.L | EMCA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.78% | -24.69% | +12.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.46% | -2.21% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.47% | -3.58% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.78% | -20.14% | +8.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -0.53% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.57% | -4.05% | +0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.43% | 0.57% | -0.14% |
Volatility
DRGN.L vs. EMCA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF (DRGN.L) is 0.79%, while iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMCA.L) has a volatility of 1.06%. This indicates that DRGN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMCA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRGN.L | EMCA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.79% | 1.06% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.11% | 3.26% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.50% | 3.82% | -0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.65% | 5.25% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.58% | 8.79% | -4.21% |
DRGN.L vs. EMCA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRGN.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EMCA.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRGN.L vs. EMCA.L - Dividend Comparison
DRGN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, while EMCA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRGN.L L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF | 0.87% | 1.94% | 2.31% | 2.45% | 2.77% | 1.43% |
EMCA.L iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRGN.L and EMCA.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRGN.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRGN.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EMCA.L.
They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for DRGN.L and 0.50% for EMCA.L.
Find the right allocation for DRGN.L and EMCA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer