PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DRFC.TO vs. HXCN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DRFC.TO vs. HXCN.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

DRFC.TO (Desjardins RI Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF) and HXCN.TO (Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF) are both Canada Equities funds. DRFC.TO is actively managed, while HXCN.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRFC.TO returned 18.32%/yr vs 15.27%/yr for HXCN.TO. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

DRFC.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Desjardins RI Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRFC.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF (HXCN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRFC.TO achieves a 11.16% return, which is significantly lower than HXCN.TO's 12.83% return.

DRFC.TO

1D
0.57%
1M
-0.03%
6M
6.78%
YTD
11.16%
1Y
29.61%
3Y*
25.13%
5Y*
18.32%
10Y*
—

HXCN.TO

1D
0.25%
1M
0.37%
6M
8.60%
YTD
12.83%
1Y
33.59%
3Y*
23.69%
5Y*
15.27%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRFC.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DRFC.TO
Desjardins RI Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF		11.16%30.94%25.27%16.28%-0.80%29.17%-5.53%
HXCN.TO
Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF		12.83%31.20%21.60%11.98%-6.07%25.23%1.60%

Correlation

The correlation between DRFC.TO and HXCN.TO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2020

0.59

Over the past year, DRFC.TO and HXCN.TO have become more correlated (0.93) than their long-term average of 0.59, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Desjardins RI Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF

Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF

Often compared with HXCN.TO:
HXCN.TO vs. HXT.TOHXCN.TO vs. XIC.TOHXCN.TO vs. ZCN.TOHXCN.TO vs. HXS.TOHXCN.TO vs. VCN.TOHXCN.TO vs. HXH.TOHXCN.TO vs. XCV.TO

Return for Risk

DRFC.TO vs. HXCN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DRFC.TO
DRFC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DRFC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRFC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRFC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DRFC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRFC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
HXCN.TO
HXCN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
HXCN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXCN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXCN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HXCN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXCN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRFC.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Desjardins RI Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRFC.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF (HXCN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

DRFC.TOHXCN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.18
2.59

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.88
3.38

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.46

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.83

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.21

16.49

-3.29

DRFC.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRFC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the HXCN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRFC.TO and HXCN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRFC.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRFC.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.87%, which is greater than HXCN.TO's maximum drawdown of -37.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRFC.TO and HXCN.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DRFC.TOHXCN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.87%

-37.09%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.65%

-8.81%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.87%

-12.49%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.04%

-16.27%

+2.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

0.00%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.92%

-4.05%

+0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

2.04%

+0.21%

Volatility

DRFC.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Desjardins RI Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRFC.TO) is 2.66%, while Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF (HXCN.TO) has a volatility of 2.89%. This indicates that DRFC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HXCN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DRFC.TOHXCN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

2.89%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.32%

10.35%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.67%

13.03%

+0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.77%

13.81%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.74%

17.72%

-0.98%

Dividends

DRFC.TO vs. HXCN.TO - Dividend Comparison

DRFC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, while HXCN.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DRFC.TO
Desjardins RI Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF		1.46%1.58%1.94%2.34%2.23%2.33%2.94%4.77%0.70%
HXCN.TO
Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.93, DRFC.TO and HXCN.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

They also come from different issuers: Desjardins and Global X.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRFC.TO and HXCN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer