PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRFC.TO vs. DRMC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRFC.TO vs. DRMC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Desjardins RI Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRFC.TO) and Desjardins RI Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DRFC.TO having a 11.16% return and DRMC.TO slightly higher at 11.28%.


DRFC.TO

1D
0.57%
1M
-0.03%
6M
6.78%
YTD
11.16%
1Y
29.61%
3Y*
25.13%
5Y*
18.32%
10Y*

DRMC.TO

1D
0.26%
1M
0.43%
6M
7.31%
YTD
11.28%
1Y
31.76%
3Y*
23.99%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRFC.TO vs. DRMC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DRFC.TO
Desjardins RI Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF
11.16%30.94%25.27%16.28%-0.80%29.17%-2.93%15.09%-6.41%
DRMC.TO
Desjardins RI Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF
11.28%32.01%24.10%13.91%-11.52%29.22%8.91%17.21%-9.58%

Correlation

The correlation between DRFC.TO and DRMC.TO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2018

0.49

Over the past year, DRFC.TO and DRMC.TO have become more correlated (0.88) than their long-term average of 0.49, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRFC.TO vs. DRMC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRFC.TO
DRFC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DRFC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRFC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRFC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DRFC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRFC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

DRMC.TO
DRMC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DRMC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRMC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRMC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DRMC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRMC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRFC.TO vs. DRMC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Desjardins RI Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRFC.TO) and Desjardins RI Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRFC.TODRMC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.43

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.40

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.21

13.21

0.00

DRFC.TO vs. DRMC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRFC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the DRMC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRFC.TO and DRMC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRFC.TO vs. DRMC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRFC.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.87%, which is greater than DRMC.TO's maximum drawdown of -34.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRFC.TO and DRMC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRFC.TODRMC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.87%

-34.55%

-5.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.65%

-9.40%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.87%

-12.30%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.04%

-20.43%

+6.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.14%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.92%

-4.50%

+0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

2.41%

-0.16%

Volatility

DRFC.TO vs. DRMC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Desjardins RI Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRFC.TO) and Desjardins RI Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMC.TO) have volatilities of 2.66% and 2.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRFC.TODRMC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

2.60%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.32%

11.04%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.67%

13.82%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.77%

13.96%

-0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.74%

17.37%

-0.63%

Dividends

DRFC.TO vs. DRMC.TO - Dividend Comparison

DRFC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than DRMC.TO's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DRFC.TO
Desjardins RI Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF
1.46%1.58%1.94%2.34%2.23%2.33%2.94%4.77%0.70%
DRMC.TO
Desjardins RI Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF
1.59%1.72%2.16%2.66%2.53%2.18%2.75%2.52%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRFC.TO and DRMC.TO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRFC.TO and DRMC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer