PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DREVX vs. DSIBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DREVX vs. DSIBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Large Cap Securities Fund (DREVX) and BNY Mellon Short-Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (DSIBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DREVX achieves a 6.74% return, which is significantly higher than DSIBX's 1.05% return. Over the past 10 years, DREVX has outperformed DSIBX with an annualized return of 15.79%, while DSIBX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.37% annualized return.


DREVX

1D
-0.82%
1M
2.89%
YTD
6.74%
6M
7.34%
1Y
22.31%
3Y*
21.80%
5Y*
14.48%
10Y*
15.79%

DSIBX

1D
0.08%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.05%
6M
1.45%
1Y
3.69%
3Y*
3.63%
5Y*
1.39%
10Y*
1.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DREVX vs. DSIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DREVX
BNY Mellon Large Cap Securities Fund
6.74%16.70%27.17%31.07%-17.94%27.17%26.52%27.09%-1.29%20.12%
DSIBX
BNY Mellon Short-Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund
1.05%4.53%2.66%3.01%-3.79%-0.36%2.39%3.27%1.22%1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between DREVX and DSIBX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 1987

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DREVX vs. DSIBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DREVX
DREVX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
DREVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DREVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
DREVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
DREVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
DREVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

DSIBX
DSIBX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DSIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
DSIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DREVX vs. DSIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Large Cap Securities Fund (DREVX) and BNY Mellon Short-Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (DSIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DREVXDSIBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

2.05

-0.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

3.02

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.27

9.25

-0.98

DREVX vs. DSIBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DREVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is lower than the DSIBX Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DREVX and DSIBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DREVXDSIBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

3.01

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.95

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.90

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

1.91

-1.53

Drawdowns

DREVX vs. DSIBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DREVX drawdown since its inception was -54.68%, which is greater than DSIBX's maximum drawdown of -6.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DREVX and DSIBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DREVXDSIBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.68%

-6.02%

-48.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.41%

-1.23%

-10.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.52%

-1.56%

-20.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.69%

-6.02%

-18.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.25%

-6.02%

-26.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-0.23%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.01%

-0.52%

-12.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

0.40%

+2.30%

Volatility

DREVX vs. DSIBX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Large Cap Securities Fund (DREVX) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to BNY Mellon Short-Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (DSIBX) at 0.46%. This indicates that DREVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DSIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DREVXDSIBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

0.46%

+2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.11%

0.97%

+9.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.36%

1.23%

+12.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.68%

1.47%

+17.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.94%

1.54%

+17.40%

DREVX vs. DSIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DREVX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than DSIBX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

DREVX vs. DSIBX - Dividend Comparison

DREVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.91%, more than DSIBX's 2.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DREVX
BNY Mellon Large Cap Securities Fund
9.91%12.89%8.77%5.12%4.82%11.43%6.28%6.74%9.01%9.11%8.71%11.24%
DSIBX
BNY Mellon Short-Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund
2.53%2.93%2.07%1.12%0.62%0.72%1.20%1.66%1.29%1.05%0.92%1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


DREVX and DSIBX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DREVX has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to DSIBX (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DREVX dropped -54.68% vs DSIBX's -6.02%.

DSIBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DREVX and DSIBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer